From: guy.shapiro@mobi-wize.com (Guy Shapiro)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: imx6ul: power-up using the RTC
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:15:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a59477d-548f-4253-ddf5-4ecd478083b9@mobi-wize.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170120121210.gm3wcg4yyvrigpn3@earth>
Sorry for the bad mailer :( Resending...
On 20/01/2017 14:12, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:49:11PM +0200, Guy Shapiro wrote:
>> I'm trying to use the low power RTC of the i.MX6UL to start from
>> power-off state.
>>
>> I started by hopefully running: # echo +30 >
>> /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm && shutdown -h now The system was
>> powered down, but it didn't come up after 30 seconds as expected.
>>
>> So I dug into the datasheet and the source...
>> To activate the power on alarm, the flags SRTC_ENV, LPTA_EN and LPWUI_EN on
>> the SNVS_LP Control register (LPCR) should be asserted. The wakeup time
>> should be written to the SNVS_LP Time alarm register (LPTA). The code that
>> does this is on drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c:snvs_rtc_set_alarm().
>>
>> The first problem I found was with the use of the syscon-poweroff driver.
>> The "Turn off System Power" flag is part of the same register (LPCR). The
>> current code of syscon-poweroff set the register to the "mask" property from
>> the device tree on power off, overriding all the existing flags.
>> After setting the "mask" property on the device tree to 0x6b instead of
>> 0x60 (asserting the mentioned bits), the system do power up on timer, as
>> expected.
>>
>> However, I didn't like the idea of keeping those flags on even when no one
>> set the alarm.
>> As a quick test, I modified the syscon-poweroff driver to ignore the bits
>> that are not on the mask:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/syscon-poweroff.c
>> b/drivers/power/reset/syscon-poweroff.c
>> index b683383..a5da02b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/reset/syscon-poweroff.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/syscon-poweroff.c
>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static u32 mask;
>> static void syscon_poweroff(void)
>> {
>> /* Issue the poweroff */
>> - regmap_write(map, offset, mask);
>> + regmap_update_bits(map, offset, mask, mask);
>> mdelay(1000);
>>
>>
>> After applying this fix, the wake up alarm didn't work. Strangely, when I
>> added some debug prints to investigate the case, it worked again
>> (sometimes... depends on the exact places I add the prints).
>> I suspect that some other driver clears the flags during the power down, but
>> I couldn't find such driver.
>>
>> Do you have any clue what code may change this register during the shutdown
>> process? Any other insights are welcomed as well :)
> To summarize it looks like this?
>
> | regmap_write | 0x60 | broken |
> | regmap_write | 0x6b | works stable |
> | regmap_update_bits | 0x60 | works only with dbg prints |
Yes, though I managed to add some useful debug prints while keeping the code
broken.
>
> For me it looks like the debug prints may delay the poweroff driver
> long enough, that some other driver (rtc?) writes the 0x0b bits.
The problem happens even if I add a long sleep between the RTC setting
and the power down command.
>
> FWIW we can't switch from regmap_write to regmap_update_bits in the
> syscon driver, since that may break other users. I guess we need to
> introduce a DT property providing the update mask. Unfortunately the
> register value property is already named mask :/
I agree. After fixing the bug, I'll start a discussion about this with
the DT list.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-22 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-18 14:49 imx6ul: power-up using the RTC Guy Shapiro
2017-01-20 12:12 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-01-20 15:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-01-22 11:17 ` Guy Shapiro
2017-01-29 7:36 ` Guy Shapiro
2017-01-22 10:46 ` Guy Shapiro
2017-01-22 11:15 ` Guy Shapiro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a59477d-548f-4253-ddf5-4ecd478083b9@mobi-wize.com \
--to=guy.shapiro@mobi-wize.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox