From: sre@kernel.org (Sebastian Reichel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: imx6ul: power-up using the RTC
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:12:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170120121210.gm3wcg4yyvrigpn3@earth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b516070d-6539-98d1-c832-d79ac89e8d43@mobi-wize.com>
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:49:11PM +0200, Guy Shapiro wrote:
> I'm trying to use the low power RTC of the i.MX6UL to start from
> power-off state.
>
> I started by hopefully running: # echo +30 >
> /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm && shutdown -h now The system was
> powered down, but it didn't come up after 30 seconds as expected.
>
> So I dug into the datasheet and the source...
> To activate the power on alarm, the flags SRTC_ENV, LPTA_EN and LPWUI_EN on
> the SNVS_LP Control register (LPCR) should be asserted. The wakeup time
> should be written to the SNVS_LP Time alarm register (LPTA). The code that
> does this is on drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c:snvs_rtc_set_alarm().
>
> The first problem I found was with the use of the syscon-poweroff driver.
> The "Turn off System Power" flag is part of the same register (LPCR). The
> current code of syscon-poweroff set the register to the "mask" property from
> the device tree on power off, overriding all the existing flags.
> After setting the "mask" property on the device tree to 0x6b instead of
> 0x60 (asserting the mentioned bits), the system do power up on timer, as
> expected.
>
> However, I didn't like the idea of keeping those flags on even when no one
> set the alarm.
> As a quick test, I modified the syscon-poweroff driver to ignore the bits
> that are not on the mask:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/syscon-poweroff.c
> b/drivers/power/reset/syscon-poweroff.c
> index b683383..a5da02b 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/reset/syscon-poweroff.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/syscon-poweroff.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static u32 mask;
> static void syscon_poweroff(void)
> {
> /* Issue the poweroff */
> - regmap_write(map, offset, mask);
> + regmap_update_bits(map, offset, mask, mask);
> mdelay(1000);
>
>
> After applying this fix, the wake up alarm didn't work. Strangely, when I
> added some debug prints to investigate the case, it worked again
> (sometimes... depends on the exact places I add the prints).
> I suspect that some other driver clears the flags during the power down, but
> I couldn't find such driver.
>
> Do you have any clue what code may change this register during the shutdown
> process? Any other insights are welcomed as well :)
To summarize it looks like this?
| regmap_write | 0x60 | broken |
| regmap_write | 0x6b | works stable |
| regmap_update_bits | 0x60 | works only with dbg prints |
For me it looks like the debug prints may delay the poweroff driver
long enough, that some other driver (rtc?) writes the 0x0b bits.
FWIW we can't switch from regmap_write to regmap_update_bits in the
syscon driver, since that may break other users. I guess we need to
introduce a DT property providing the update mask. Unfortunately the
register value property is already named mask :/
-- Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170120/a7a4320f/attachment-0001.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-20 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-18 14:49 imx6ul: power-up using the RTC Guy Shapiro
2017-01-20 12:12 ` Sebastian Reichel [this message]
2017-01-20 15:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-01-22 11:17 ` Guy Shapiro
2017-01-29 7:36 ` Guy Shapiro
2017-01-22 10:46 ` Guy Shapiro
2017-01-22 11:15 ` Guy Shapiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170120121210.gm3wcg4yyvrigpn3@earth \
--to=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox