Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, usama.anjum@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, david.laight.linux@gmail.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, ruanjinjie@huawei.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org,
	maz@kernel.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
	will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/21] arm64: cmpxchg128: LSE: Remove redundant operands
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 11:06:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b0a435e-68c1-46c2-8fc0-310694728772@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908151741.394589-6-mark.rutland@arm.com>

On 9/8/26 16:17, Mark Rutland wrote:
> The LSE assembly for cmpxhg128*() has redundant operands which cause
> unnecessary register pressure. These operands can be removed without
> adverse effects, as described below.
> 
> It is necessary to force specific registers for the 64-bit halves of
> 'old' and 'new', as the encoding of CASP[A][L] requires that these
> halves are allocated into even/odd register pairs, and contemporary
> versions of LLVM don't support a mechanism to allocate a value into an
> even/odd register pair for inline assembly. We manually allocate these
> into x0/x1/x2/x3.
> 
> It is not necessary to force the address into a specific register, as
> the encoding of CASP[A][L] can accept this in any GPR or SP. Hence, it
> is not necessary to manually allocate the address into x4 for the
> '[ptr]' operand. The assembly uses the '[v]' operand, and contemporary
> compilers happen to allocate '[v]' into a separate register from
> '[ptr]', meaning that '[ptr]' only serves to create register pressure.
> 
> It is not necessary to allocate the '[oldval1]' and '[oldval2]'
> operands, as these are not used by the assembly. The assembly uses the
> '[old1]' and '[old2]' operands for both input and output. The
> '[oldval1]' and '[oldval2]' operands only serve to create register
> pressure.
> 
> Remove the redundant operands. This saves on register pressure, as
> demonstrated by the test case below. There's still some unfortunate
> register shuffling due to the manual allocation of 'old' and 'new', but
> this should be less prominent within a larger function.
> 
> Test case:
> 
> | u128 outline_cmpxchg128(u128 *p, u128 old, u128 new)
> | {
> | 	return cmpxchg128(p, old, new);
> | }
> 
> Generated code before this patch:
> 
> | <outline_cmpxchg128>:
> |        mov     x6, x0
> |        mov     x1, x3
> |        mov     x0, x2
> |        b       1f
> |        mov     x2, x4
> |        mov     x3, x5
> |        mov     x4, x6
> |        mov     x5, x0
> |        mov     x7, x1
> |        caspal  x0, x1, x2, x3, [x6]
> |        ret
> | 1:     prfm    pstl1strm, [x6]
> | 2:     ldxp    x8, x7, [x6]
> |        cmp     x8, x0
> |        ccmp    x7, x3, #0x0, eq
> |        b.ne    3f
> |        stlxp   w2, x4, x5, [x6]
> |        cbnz    w2, 2b
> |        dmb     ish
> | 3:     mov     x0, x8
> |        mov     x1, x7
> |        ret
> 
> Generated code after this patch:
> 
> | <outline_cmpxchg128>:
> |        mov     x6, x0
> |        mov     x0, x2
> |        b       1f
> |        mov     x1, x3
> |        mov     x2, x4
> |        mov     x3, x5
> |        caspal  x0, x1, x2, x3, [x6]
> |        ret
> | 1:     prfm    pstl1strm, [x6]
> | 2:     ldxp    x8, x7, [x6]
> |        cmp     x8, x0
> |        ccmp    x7, x3, #0x0, eq
> |        3f
> |        stlxp   w2, x4, x5, [x6]
> |        cbnz    w2, 2b
> |        dmb     ish
> | 3:     mov     x0, x8
> |        mov     x1, x7
> |        ret
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>
> Cc: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h
> index afad1849c4cf5..d588af0565331 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h
> @@ -291,15 +291,13 @@ __lse__cmpxchg128##name(volatile u128 *ptr, u128 old, u128 new)		\
>  	register unsigned long x1 asm ("x1") = o.high;			\
>  	register unsigned long x2 asm ("x2") = n.low;			\
>  	register unsigned long x3 asm ("x3") = n.high;			\
> -	register unsigned long x4 asm ("x4") = (unsigned long)ptr;	\
>  									\
>  	asm volatile(							\
>  	__LSE_PREAMBLE							\
>  	"	casp" #mb "\t%[old1], %[old2], %[new1], %[new2], %[v]\n"\
>  	: [old1] "+&r" (x0), [old2] "+&r" (x1),				\
>  	  [v] "+Q" (*(u128 *)ptr)					\
> -	: [new1] "r" (x2), [new2] "r" (x3), [ptr] "r" (x4),		\
> -	  [oldval1] "r" (o.low), [oldval2] "r" (o.high)			\

Both 'old1' and #old are read and write and that reflected by '+' constraint modifier.
However, I do not fully understand why we need earlyclobber for them:
 - they are not written before read
 - we already constrained registers, so they do not overlap
 - cmpxchg few lines above doesn't need it

I had a look at ll/sc counterpart and both earlyclobebr and '=' constraint modifier
make sense there, since we do not want registers to overlap and they are written.

I admit might be missing something. Anyway, FWIW

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>

> +	: [new1] "r" (x2), [new2] "r" (x3)				\
>  	: cl);								\
>  									\
>  	r.low = x0; r.high = x1;					\
> -- 2.30.2
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-08 15:17 [PATCH v4 00/21] Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_write() casting Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 10:56   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_and() mask generation Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] arm64: percpu: Fix LSE operations on {8,16}-bit types Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 15:18   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] arm64: cmpxchg: LL/SC: Avoid redundant extension Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] arm64: cmpxchg128: LSE: Remove redundant operands Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 10:06   ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
2026-09-11 11:43     ` Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] arm64: preempt: Simplify and optimize __preempt_count_dec_and_test() Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] arm64: preempt: Treat should_resched() as unlikely Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] arm64: ptrace: Always inline pt_regs_[read,write}_reg() Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 10:20   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 09/21] arm64: percpu: Factor out percpu offset asm Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 12:39   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] arm64: gpr-num: Add wxN aliases for wN registers Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 12:43   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] arm64: gpr-num: add __GPR_NUM() helper Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 14:24   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] arm64: entry: sdei: Restore all clobberable GPRs Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 12:47   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] arm64: entry: sdei: Make 'tsk' available Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 13:06   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] arm64: percpu: Add infrastructure for preemptible this_cpu_*() ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 15/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible read/write ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible void RMW ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible return " Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible XCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG128 ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] arm64: percpu: Remove _pcp_protect*() wrappers Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1b0a435e-68c1-46c2-8fc0-310694728772@arm.com \
    --to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=usama.anjum@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox