KVM: CONFIG_LOCK_DEP and CONFIG_LOCK

Refresh

This website lore-kernel.gnuweeb.org/linux-arm-kernel/20150123094431.GI15076@cbox/t/ is currently offline. Cloudflare\'s Always Online™ shows a snapshot of this web page from the Internet Archive\'s Wayback Machine. To check for the live version, click Refresh.

* KVM: CONFIG_LOCK_DEP and CONFIG_LOCK_DETECTOR? @ 2015-01-22 9:34 Paul Bolle 2015-01-22 19:13 ` Mario Smarduch 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Paul Bolle @ 2015-01-22 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Mario, Your commit c64735554c0a ("KVM: arm: Add initial dirty page locking support") is included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150122). I noticed because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a minor problem with it. This commit added a comment that mentions CONFIG_LOCK_DEP and CONFIG_LOCK_DETECTOR. It seems CONFIG_LOCKDEP and CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR should be used instead. Is a trivial patch to fix these typos queued somewhere? Thanks, Paul Bolle ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* KVM: CONFIG_LOCK_DEP and CONFIG_LOCK_DETECTOR? 2015-01-22 9:34 KVM: CONFIG_LOCK_DEP and CONFIG_LOCK_DETECTOR? Paul Bolle @ 2015-01-22 19:13 ` Mario Smarduch 2015-01-22 19:18 ` Marc Zyngier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mario Smarduch @ 2015-01-22 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 01/22/2015 01:34 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > Mario, > > Your commit c64735554c0a ("KVM: arm: Add initial dirty page locking > support") is included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150122). I > noticed because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a minor > problem with it. > > This commit added a comment that mentions CONFIG_LOCK_DEP and > CONFIG_LOCK_DETECTOR. It seems CONFIG_LOCKDEP and CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR > should be used instead. Is a trivial patch to fix these typos queued > somewhere? > > Thanks, > > > Paul Bolle > Hi Paul, thanks for spotting that. No there is no trivial patch queued, didn't notice it until now. Can I submit a follow up trivial patch later? - Mario ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* KVM: CONFIG_LOCK_DEP and CONFIG_LOCK_DETECTOR? 2015-01-22 19:13 ` Mario Smarduch @ 2015-01-22 19:18 ` Marc Zyngier 2015-01-23 9:44 ` Christoffer Dall 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-01-22 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 22/01/15 19:13, Mario Smarduch wrote: > On 01/22/2015 01:34 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: >> Mario, >> >> Your commit c64735554c0a ("KVM: arm: Add initial dirty page locking >> support") is included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150122). I >> noticed because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a minor >> problem with it. >> >> This commit added a comment that mentions CONFIG_LOCK_DEP and >> CONFIG_LOCK_DETECTOR. It seems CONFIG_LOCKDEP and CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR >> should be used instead. Is a trivial patch to fix these typos queued >> somewhere? >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Paul Bolle >> > > Hi Paul, > thanks for spotting that. No there is no trivial patch > queued, didn't notice it until now. Can I submit a follow > up trivial patch later? Yeah, that can definitely wait. I think we have slightly bigger fish to fry for now... ;-) If someone sends us a patch once -rc1 is out, we'll queue it. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* KVM: CONFIG_LOCK_DEP and CONFIG_LOCK_DETECTOR? 2015-01-22 19:18 ` Marc Zyngier @ 2015-01-23 9:44 ` Christoffer Dall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Christoffer Dall @ 2015-01-23 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 07:18:25PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 22/01/15 19:13, Mario Smarduch wrote: > > On 01/22/2015 01:34 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > >> Mario, > >> > >> Your commit c64735554c0a ("KVM: arm: Add initial dirty page locking > >> support") is included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150122). I > >> noticed because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a minor > >> problem with it. > >> > >> This commit added a comment that mentions CONFIG_LOCK_DEP and > >> CONFIG_LOCK_DETECTOR. It seems CONFIG_LOCKDEP and CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR > >> should be used instead. Is a trivial patch to fix these typos queued > >> somewhere? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> > >> Paul Bolle > >> > > > > Hi Paul, > > thanks for spotting that. No there is no trivial patch > > queued, didn't notice it until now. Can I submit a follow > > up trivial patch later? > > Yeah, that can definitely wait. I think we have slightly bigger fish to > fry for now... ;-) > > If someone sends us a patch once -rc1 is out, we'll queue it. > I'll just fix it up before sending the pull request today. -Christoffer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-23 9:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-01-22 9:34 KVM: CONFIG_LOCK_DEP and CONFIG_LOCK_DETECTOR? Paul Bolle 2015-01-22 19:13 ` Mario Smarduch 2015-01-22 19:18 ` Marc Zyngier 2015-01-23 9:44 ` Christoffer Dall