* question about PMU interrupt in binding
@ 2015-02-24 15:44 Stuart Yoder
2015-02-24 16:19 ` Mark Rutland
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stuart Yoder @ 2015-02-24 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Stephen/Will,
Had a question about the definition of "interrupts" in the
PMU binding:
> commit d84c47837d800c0db1c9f2015a1565504417f812
> Author: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Date: Fri Feb 7 21:01:24 2014 +0000
>
> devicetree: bindings: Document Krait performance monitor units (PMU)
>
> Document the Krait PMU compatible string.
>
> Cc: <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> index 3e1e498..ce73144 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> @@ -16,7 +16,14 @@ Required properties:
> "arm,arm11mpcore-pmu"
> "arm,arm1176-pmu"
> "arm,arm1136-pmu"
> -- interrupts : 1 combined interrupt or 1 per core.
> + "qcom,krait-pmu"
> +- interrupts : 1 combined interrupt or 1 per core. If the interrupt is a per-cpu
> + interrupt (PPI) then 1 interrupt should be specified.
If the interrupt is per-cpu do you mean 1 interrupt _per cpu_ should
be specified? As written it seems to say _only_ "1 interrupt" should be
specificed.
Thanks,
Stuart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* question about PMU interrupt in binding
2015-02-24 15:44 question about PMU interrupt in binding Stuart Yoder
@ 2015-02-24 16:19 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-24 16:48 ` Stuart Yoder
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2015-02-24 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:44:27PM +0000, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> Stephen/Will,
>
> Had a question about the definition of "interrupts" in the
> PMU binding:
>
> > commit d84c47837d800c0db1c9f2015a1565504417f812
> > Author: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > Date: Fri Feb 7 21:01:24 2014 +0000
> >
> > devicetree: bindings: Document Krait performance monitor units (PMU)
> >
> > Document the Krait PMU compatible string.
> >
> > Cc: <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> > index 3e1e498..ce73144 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> > @@ -16,7 +16,14 @@ Required properties:
> > "arm,arm11mpcore-pmu"
> > "arm,arm1176-pmu"
> > "arm,arm1136-pmu"
> > -- interrupts : 1 combined interrupt or 1 per core.
> > + "qcom,krait-pmu"
> > +- interrupts : 1 combined interrupt or 1 per core. If the interrupt is a per-cpu
> > + interrupt (PPI) then 1 interrupt should be specified.
>
> If the interrupt is per-cpu do you mean 1 interrupt _per cpu_ should
> be specified? As written it seems to say _only_ "1 interrupt" should be
> specificed.
The specification as written is correct.
If it's a per-cpu interrupt (i.e. a PPI), we'll recognise this fact and
handle it appropriately in the backend, on the assumption that if the
PMU is connected via a PPI all CPUs share this PPI.
Thanks,
Mark.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* question about PMU interrupt in binding
2015-02-24 16:19 ` Mark Rutland
@ 2015-02-24 16:48 ` Stuart Yoder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stuart Yoder @ 2015-02-24 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Rutland [mailto:mark.rutland at arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 10:20 AM
> To: Yoder Stuart-B08248
> Cc: sboyd at codeaurora.org; Will Deacon; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: question about PMU interrupt in binding
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:44:27PM +0000, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> > Stephen/Will,
> >
> > Had a question about the definition of "interrupts" in the
> > PMU binding:
> >
> > > commit d84c47837d800c0db1c9f2015a1565504417f812
> > > Author: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > > Date: Fri Feb 7 21:01:24 2014 +0000
> > >
> > > devicetree: bindings: Document Krait performance monitor units (PMU)
> > >
> > > Document the Krait PMU compatible string.
> > >
> > > Cc: <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> > > index 3e1e498..ce73144 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> > > @@ -16,7 +16,14 @@ Required properties:
> > > "arm,arm11mpcore-pmu"
> > > "arm,arm1176-pmu"
> > > "arm,arm1136-pmu"
> > > -- interrupts : 1 combined interrupt or 1 per core.
> > > + "qcom,krait-pmu"
> > > +- interrupts : 1 combined interrupt or 1 per core. If the interrupt is a per-cpu
> > > + interrupt (PPI) then 1 interrupt should be specified.
> >
> > If the interrupt is per-cpu do you mean 1 interrupt _per cpu_ should
> > be specified? As written it seems to say _only_ "1 interrupt" should be
> > specificed.
>
> The specification as written is correct.
>
> If it's a per-cpu interrupt (i.e. a PPI), we'll recognise this fact and
> handle it appropriately in the backend, on the assumption that if the
> PMU is connected via a PPI all CPUs share this PPI.
Thanks.
Stuart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-24 16:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-24 15:44 question about PMU interrupt in binding Stuart Yoder
2015-02-24 16:19 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-24 16:48 ` Stuart Yoder
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox