From: robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com (Robert Richter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation.
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:32:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160211153255.GR24726@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK5HV9yzBE+ANnTw26eVR7Dy+B8OkwQ-7WF8KDa86Fd9g@mail.gmail.com>
On 11.02.16 08:50:41, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
> <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> > dt node parsing for numa topology is done using device property
> > numa-node-id and device node distance-map.
>
> How is it that powerpc doesn't need flat DT parsing for NUMA? Both
> arches are memblock based and the binding is similar IIRC, so you
> should be able to find a way to do this with the unflattened tree.
> Ideally, there should be some common code shared as well.
>
> Do you have a git tree with this series?
I have pushed it here for you:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rric/linux.git/log/?h=thunder/numa-v10
-Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-11 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-02 10:09 [PATCH v10 0/8] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 1/8] arm64, numa: adding " Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 2/8] Documentation, dt, numa: dt bindings for numa Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 23:34 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-04 11:15 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-11 14:50 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-11 15:32 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2016-02-11 15:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 4/8] arm64, numa : Enable numa dt for arm64 platforms Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 5/8] arm64, dt, thunderx: Add initial dts for Cavium Thunderx in 2 node topology Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 6/8] arm64, mm, numa: Adding numa balancing support for arm64 Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 7/8] topology, cleanup: Avoid redefinition of cpumask_of_pcibus in asm header files Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 8/8] numa, mm, cleanup: remove redundant NODE_DATA macro from " Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-07 8:40 ` kbuild test robot
2016-02-02 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 0/8] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160211153255.GR24726@rric.localdomain \
--to=robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox