From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: Enable interrupts before calling schedule()
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 11:54:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160523105420.GE4892@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1605201740320.3639@nanos>
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 05:42:17PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> do_work_pending() calls schedule() with interrupts disabled, which is just
> wrong. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -573,6 +573,7 @@ do_work_pending(struct pt_regs *regs, un
> trace_hardirqs_off();
> do {
> if (likely(thread_flags & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED)) {
> + local_irq_enable();
> schedule();
> } else {
> if (unlikely(!user_mode(regs)))
We may have the same bug on arm64 (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S). Is there
a more fundamental problem with calling schedule() with IRQs off? The
__schedule() function disables the IRQs shortly after it is entered.
To silence IRQ trace warnings on arm64, we merged commit db3899a6477a
("arm64: Add trace_hardirqs_off annotation in ret_to_user"). But we were
also debating whether enabling the IRQs before calling schedule() in
arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S would make more sense. It looks like we need
to revisit this patch:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/commit/?h=arm64/entry-deasm&id=d244472af6e88c55603dc1ba342fae4e85cde31c
Thanks.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-23 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-20 15:42 [PATCH] arm: Enable interrupts before calling schedule() Thomas Gleixner
2016-05-23 10:54 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2016-05-23 11:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-05-23 12:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160523105420.GE4892@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox