From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:49:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161024194917.g5oezqc4uacsyt24@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdb7zs7Nhs3i1o=WUt787vJCuePre3Tj3wLu++qwpO0atQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Linus,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:03:59AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> > The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now,
> > even though we still support the old one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>
> Patch applied.
Thanks a lot.
However, it looks like the first patch from this serie is missing from
your tree, is there a reason for that?
Also, in order to preserve bisectability, could you create an
immutable branch for those sunxi patches so that I can merge the DT
bits?
Thanks,
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20161024/b378beb9/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-24 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-20 13:49 [PATCH v3 0/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Generic bindings rework Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Deal with configless pins Maxime Ripard
2016-10-29 9:08 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Support generic binding Maxime Ripard
2016-10-24 0:02 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings Maxime Ripard
2016-10-24 0:03 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-24 19:49 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2016-10-25 12:07 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-25 13:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: sunxi: Remove useless allwinner,pull property Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 15:38 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2016-10-21 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: sunxi: Remove useless allwinner, pull property Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161024194917.g5oezqc4uacsyt24@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox