From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM64: dma-mapping: preallocate DMA-debug hash tables in core_initcall
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:39:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161116123918.qzaqczaqri2hab43@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479288013-30945-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:20:13AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> fs_initcall is definitely too late to initialize DMA-debug hash tables,
> because some drivers might get probed and use DMA mapping framework
> already in core_initcall. Late initialization of DMA-debug results in
> false warning about accessing memory, that was not allocated. This issue
> has been observed on ARM 32bit, but the same driver can be used also on
> ARM64.
>
> This patch moves initialization of DMA-debug to core_initcall. This is
> safe from the initialization perspective. dma_debug_do_init() internally
> calls debugfs functions and debugfs also gets initialised at
> core_initcall(), and that is earlier than arch code in the link order,
> so it will get initialized just before the DMA-debug.
Do we really want to rely on the link order within an initcall level?
What guarantees this?
I hope someone sorts out the deferred probe or some other dependency
detection mechanism to address this issue. But in the meantime I
wouldn't merge a patch which relies on just the link order.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-16 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20161116092025eucas1p2ebaf3ead7de79130ca2656d532284e5b@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2016-11-16 9:20 ` [PATCH] ARM64: dma-mapping: preallocate DMA-debug hash tables in core_initcall Marek Szyprowski
2016-11-16 11:56 ` Robin Murphy
2016-11-16 12:39 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2016-11-17 11:35 ` Marek Szyprowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161116123918.qzaqczaqri2hab43@localhost \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox