public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: m.szyprowski@samsung.com (Marek Szyprowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM64: dma-mapping: preallocate DMA-debug hash tables in core_initcall
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:35:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d01cd35-99b2-432a-4c48-6c130cd69357@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161116123918.qzaqczaqri2hab43@localhost>

Hi Catalin,


On 2016-11-16 13:39, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:20:13AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> fs_initcall is definitely too late to initialize DMA-debug hash tables,
>> because some drivers might get probed and use DMA mapping framework
>> already in core_initcall. Late initialization of DMA-debug results in
>> false warning about accessing memory, that was not allocated. This issue
>> has been observed on ARM 32bit, but the same driver can be used also on
>> ARM64.
>>
>> This patch moves initialization of DMA-debug to core_initcall. This is
>> safe from the initialization perspective. dma_debug_do_init() internally
>> calls debugfs functions and debugfs also gets initialised at
>> core_initcall(), and that is earlier than arch code in the link order,
>> so it will get initialized just before the DMA-debug.
> Do we really want to rely on the link order within an initcall level?
> What guarantees this?

There are many places in the kernel which rely on link order and I'm 
convinced
that calling initcalls in link order is guaranteed.

> I hope someone sorts out the deferred probe or some other dependency
> detection mechanism to address this issue. But in the meantime I
> wouldn't merge a patch which relies on just the link order.

This has nothing to deferred probe. This patch is related to initialization
of dma-debug framework. In my initial submission for ARM arch I proposed
pure_initcall to have this infrastructure available as early as possible,
but Russell pointed that dma-debug depends on debugfs initialization, so
it should be initialized after it. He also pointed that core_initcall will
be fine for this.

Please also note that dt devices are also populated from core_initcall and
drivers can then bind to them and try to use dma-mapping api, what results
in false warnings about using uninitialized memory as dma-debug framework
is unable to track allocations done before its initialization.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

      reply	other threads:[~2016-11-17 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20161116092025eucas1p2ebaf3ead7de79130ca2656d532284e5b@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2016-11-16  9:20 ` [PATCH] ARM64: dma-mapping: preallocate DMA-debug hash tables in core_initcall Marek Szyprowski
2016-11-16 11:56   ` Robin Murphy
2016-11-16 12:39   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-11-17 11:35     ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6d01cd35-99b2-432a-4c48-6c130cd69357@samsung.com \
    --to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox