From: dongas86@gmail.com (Dong Aisheng)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] soc: imx: gpc: fix imx6sl gpc power domain regression
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 03:23:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170322192356.GC16264@b29396-OptiPlex-7040> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490001974.2895.11.camel@pengutronix.de>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:26:14AM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Montag, den 20.03.2017, 14:15 +0800 schrieb Dong Aisheng:
> > Commit 721cabf6c660 ("soc: imx: move PGC handling to a new GPC driver")
> > broke the MX6SL GPC power domain support.
> > It always got the following error:
> > [ 1.248364] imx-gpc 20dc000.gpc: could not find pgc DT node
> > This patch adds back the legecy support.
>
> This patch removes a safeguard against abusing the old binding for new
> SoCs. Please leave this check in place and instead loosen the check to
> also allow the old i.MX6SL binding.
>
Thanks for the reminder.
I found beside the checking, we probably also need some extra fix that
the current imx_gpc_old_dt_init() only supports two domains while the
driver formerly supports three for MX6SL.
And because the num_domains is defined by driver itself, no need check
in imx_gpc_old_dt_init() anymore.
The patch would be as follows:
diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c b/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
index 4885ec2..6a806a1 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
@@ -303,10 +303,13 @@ static struct genpd_onecell_data imx_gpc_onecell_data = {
static int imx_gpc_old_dt_init(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap)
{
+ const struct of_device_id *of_id =
+ of_match_device(imx_gpc_dt_ids, dev);
+ const struct imx_gpc_dt_data *of_id_data = of_id->data;
struct imx_pm_domain *domain;
int i, ret;
- for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < of_id_data->num_domains; i++) {
domain = &imx_gpc_domains[i];
domain->regmap = regmap;
domain->ipg_rate_mhz = 66;
@@ -324,7 +327,7 @@ static int imx_gpc_old_dt_init(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap)
}
}
- for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < of_id_data->num_domains; i++)
pm_genpd_init(&imx_gpc_domains[i].base, NULL, false);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS)) {
@@ -337,7 +340,7 @@ static int imx_gpc_old_dt_init(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap)
return 0;
genpd_err:
- for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < of_id_data->num_domains; i++)
pm_genpd_remove(&imx_gpc_domains[i].base);
imx_pgc_put_clocks(&imx_gpc_domains[1]);
clk_err:
Do you think it's ok?
Regards
Dong Aisheng
> >
> > Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> > Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
> > Fixes: 721cabf6c660 ("soc: imx: move PGC handling to a new GPC driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c | 6 ------
> > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c b/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
> > index ba6e7ab..c1d0e67 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/gpc.c
> > @@ -385,12 +385,6 @@ static int imx_gpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> >
> > if (!pgc_node) {
> > - /* old DT layout is only supported for mx6q aka 2 domains */
> > - if (of_id_data->num_domains != 2) {
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not find pgc DT node\n");
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > - }
> > -
> > ret = imx_gpc_old_dt_init(&pdev->dev, regmap);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-20 6:15 [PATCH 0/8] soc: imx: gpc: fixes and clean up Dong Aisheng
2017-03-20 6:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] soc: imx: gpc: fix gpc clk get error handling Dong Aisheng
2017-03-20 8:05 ` Shawn Guo
2017-03-22 18:33 ` Dong Aisheng
2017-03-22 6:38 ` Shawn Guo
2017-03-20 6:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] soc: imx: gpc: fix the wrong using of regmap cache Dong Aisheng
2017-03-20 9:38 ` Lucas Stach
2017-03-22 18:53 ` Dong Aisheng
2017-03-22 8:43 ` Lucas Stach
2017-03-20 6:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] soc: imx: gpc: fix domain_index sanity check issue Dong Aisheng
2017-03-20 9:40 ` Lucas Stach
2017-03-20 6:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] soc: imx: gpc: fix imx6sl gpc power domain regression Dong Aisheng
2017-03-20 9:26 ` Lucas Stach
2017-03-22 19:23 ` Dong Aisheng [this message]
2017-03-22 8:46 ` Lucas Stach
2017-03-23 0:47 ` Dong Aisheng
2017-03-20 6:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] soc: imx: gpc: fix comment when power up domain Dong Aisheng
2017-03-20 9:41 ` Lucas Stach
2017-03-20 6:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] soc: imx: gpc: keep PGC_X_CTRL name align with reference manual Dong Aisheng
2017-03-20 9:42 ` Lucas Stach
2017-03-20 6:15 ` [PATCH 7/8] dt-bindings: imx-gpc: correct the DOMAIN_INDEX using Dong Aisheng
2017-03-20 9:43 ` Lucas Stach
2017-03-20 6:15 ` [PATCH 8/8] soc: imx: gpc: remove unnecessary readable_reg callback Dong Aisheng
2017-03-20 9:43 ` Lucas Stach
2017-03-22 19:25 ` Dong Aisheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170322192356.GC16264@b29396-OptiPlex-7040 \
--to=dongas86@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox