From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [media] cec: Move capability check inside #if
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:01:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170404130157.cgzmuym5yixvcy22@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170404125409.ay5yszwdkdxb6nvx@dell>
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> > On 04/04/2017 02:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > If CONFIG_RC_CORE is not enabled then none of the RC code will be
> > > executed anyway, so we're placing the capability check inside the
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c b/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c
> > > index 37217e2..06a312c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c
> > > @@ -234,10 +234,10 @@ struct cec_adapter *cec_allocate_adapter(const struct cec_adap_ops *ops,
> > > return ERR_PTR(res);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)
> > > if (!(caps & CEC_CAP_RC))
> > > return adap;
> > >
> > > -#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)
> > > /* Prepare the RC input device */
> > > adap->rc = rc_allocate_device(RC_DRIVER_SCANCODE);
> > > if (!adap->rc) {
> > >
> >
> > Not true, there is an #else further down.
>
> I saw the #else. It's inert code that becomes function-less.
>
> > That said, this code is clearly a bit confusing.
> >
> > It would be better if at the beginning of the function we'd have this:
> >
> > #if !IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)
> > caps &= ~CEC_CAP_RC;
> > #endif
> >
> > and then drop the #else bit and (as you do in this patch) move the #if up.
> >
> > Can you make a new patch for this?
>
> Sure.
No wait, sorry! This patch is the correct fix.
'caps' is already indicating !CEC_CAP_RC, which is right.
What we're trying to do here is only consider looking at the
capabilities if the RC Core is enabled. If it is not enabled, the #if
still does the right thing and makes sure that the caps are updated.
Please take another look at the semantics.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-04 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-04 12:32 [PATCH 1/2] [media] cec: Move capability check inside #if Lee Jones
2017-04-04 12:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] [media] cec: Fix runtime BUG when (CONFIG_RC_CORE && !CEC_CAP_RC) Lee Jones
2017-04-04 12:41 ` Hans Verkuil
2017-04-04 12:55 ` Lee Jones
2017-04-04 12:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] [media] cec: Move capability check inside #if Hans Verkuil
2017-04-04 12:54 ` Lee Jones
2017-04-04 12:58 ` Hans Verkuil
2017-04-04 13:01 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2017-04-04 13:14 ` Hans Verkuil
2017-04-04 13:30 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170404130157.cgzmuym5yixvcy22@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox