From: hverkuil@xs4all.nl (Hans Verkuil)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [media] cec: Move capability check inside #if
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:39:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4920d83a-8983-36cc-936d-9e0989e833ce@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170404123219.22040-1-lee.jones@linaro.org>
On 04/04/2017 02:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> If CONFIG_RC_CORE is not enabled then none of the RC code will be
> executed anyway, so we're placing the capability check inside the
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c b/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c
> index 37217e2..06a312c 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/cec/cec-core.c
> @@ -234,10 +234,10 @@ struct cec_adapter *cec_allocate_adapter(const struct cec_adap_ops *ops,
> return ERR_PTR(res);
> }
>
> +#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)
> if (!(caps & CEC_CAP_RC))
> return adap;
>
> -#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)
> /* Prepare the RC input device */
> adap->rc = rc_allocate_device(RC_DRIVER_SCANCODE);
> if (!adap->rc) {
>
Not true, there is an #else further down.
That said, this code is clearly a bit confusing.
It would be better if at the beginning of the function we'd have this:
#if !IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_RC_CORE)
caps &= ~CEC_CAP_RC;
#endif
and then drop the #else bit and (as you do in this patch) move the #if up.
Can you make a new patch for this?
Thanks!
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-04 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-04 12:32 [PATCH 1/2] [media] cec: Move capability check inside #if Lee Jones
2017-04-04 12:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] [media] cec: Fix runtime BUG when (CONFIG_RC_CORE && !CEC_CAP_RC) Lee Jones
2017-04-04 12:41 ` Hans Verkuil
2017-04-04 12:55 ` Lee Jones
2017-04-04 12:39 ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
2017-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] [media] cec: Move capability check inside #if Lee Jones
2017-04-04 12:58 ` Hans Verkuil
2017-04-04 13:01 ` Lee Jones
2017-04-04 13:14 ` Hans Verkuil
2017-04-04 13:30 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4920d83a-8983-36cc-936d-9e0989e833ce@xs4all.nl \
--to=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox