[PATCH] ARM: dts: s5pv210: add interrupt-parent for ohci

[PATCH] ARM: dts: s5pv210: add interrupt-parent for ohci

[Arnd Bergmann]

The ohci-hcd node has an interrupt number but no interrupt-parent,
leading to a warning with current dtc versions:

arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aquila.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-goni.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-smdkc110.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-smdkv210.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-torbreck.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000

As seen from the related exynos dts files, the ohci and ehci controllers
always share one interrupt number, and the number is the same here as
well, so setting the same interrupt-parent is the reasonable solution
here.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
index 247c0029659c..67358562a6ea 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
@@ -460,6 +460,7 @@
 			compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-ohci";
 			reg = <0xec300000 0x100>;
 			interrupts = <23>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&vic1>;
 			clocks = <&clocks CLK_USB_HOST>;
 			clock-names = "usbhost";
 			#address-cells = <1>;
-- 
2.9.0

[PATCH] ARM: dts: s5pv210: add interrupt-parent for ohci

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> The ohci-hcd node has an interrupt number but no interrupt-parent,
> leading to a warning with current dtc versions:
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aquila.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-goni.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-smdkc110.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-smdkv210.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-torbreck.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
>
> As seen from the related exynos dts files, the ohci and ehci controllers
> always share one interrupt number, and the number is the same here as
> well, so setting the same interrupt-parent is the reasonable solution
> here.

Your patch is correct. However my last pull request still waits and it
is quite late in this release cycle so I will apply it for v4.17 after
this merge window. On the other hand you can take it directly (in that
case: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[PATCH] ARM: dts: s5pv210: add interrupt-parent for ohci

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> The ohci-hcd node has an interrupt number but no interrupt-parent,
>> leading to a warning with current dtc versions:
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aquila.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-goni.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-smdkc110.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-smdkv210.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-torbreck.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /soc/ohci at ec300000
>>
>> As seen from the related exynos dts files, the ohci and ehci controllers
>> always share one interrupt number, and the number is the same here as
>> well, so setting the same interrupt-parent is the reasonable solution
>> here.
>
> Your patch is correct. However my last pull request still waits and it
> is quite late in this release cycle so I will apply it for v4.17 after
> this merge window. On the other hand you can take it directly (in that
> case: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>).

Applied to next/dt, thanks!

      Arnd