From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] locking/atomic, asm-generic: instrument ordering variants
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:12:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180505091229.smbvp7vlgpyld7dn@salmiak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180504182422.GT12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:24:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 07:09:09PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:01:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 06:39:32PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> > > > include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h | 1195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > > 1 file changed, 1008 insertions(+), 187 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Is there really no way to either generate or further macro compress this?
> >
> > I can definitely macro compress this somewhat, but the bulk of the
> > repetition will be the ifdeffery, which can't be macro'd away IIUC.
>
> Right, much like what we already have in linux/atomic.h I suspect,
> having to duplicating that isn't brilliant either.
>
> > Generating this with a script is possible -- do we do anything like that
> > elsewhere?
>
> There's include/generated/ in your build directory. But nothing on this
> scale I think.
Sure. I'm not familiar with how we generate those, so I'll go digging through
the build infrastructure.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-05 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-04 17:39 [PATCH 0/6] arm64: add instrumented atomics Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/6] locking/atomic, asm-generic: instrument ordering variants Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 18:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-04 18:09 ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 18:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05 9:12 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2018-05-05 8:11 ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 8:36 ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 8:54 ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Combine the atomic_andnot() and atomic64_andnot() API definitions Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 14:15 ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-06 14:12 ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more Andrea Parri
2018-05-06 14:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-07 9:54 ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-18 18:43 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-05-05 8:47 ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05 9:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:00 ` [RFC PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Introduce optimized cmpxchg_release() family of APIs for PowerPC Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:26 ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-06 1:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-05 10:16 ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 10:35 ` [RFC PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Clarify why the cmpxchg_relaxed() family of APIs falls back to full cmpxchg() Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 11:28 ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 13:27 ` [PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Move cmpxchg helpers to asm/cmpxchg.h and define the full set of cmpxchg APIs Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 14:03 ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-06 12:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-07 1:04 ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-07 6:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 9:05 ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Dmitry Vyukov
2018-05-05 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-07 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH] locking/atomics/x86/64: Clean up and fix details of <asm/atomic64_64.h> Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 9:09 ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05 10:48 ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Shorten the __atomic_op() defines to __op() Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 2/6] locking/atomic, asm-generic: instrument atomic*andnot*() Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm64: use <linux/atomic.h> for cmpxchg Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm64: fix assembly constraints " Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64: use instrumented atomics Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: instrument smp_{load_acquire,store_release} Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180505091229.smbvp7vlgpyld7dn@salmiak \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox