From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, nm@ti.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
mka@chromium.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:40:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190129051030.gu5nhr6vmcd35bzk@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190128165522.31749-2-quentin.perret@arm.com>
On 28-01-19, 16:55, Quentin Perret wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c
> index 06f0f632ec47..7572a2eb2fd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/opp/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c
> @@ -1047,3 +1047,63 @@ struct device_node *dev_pm_opp_get_of_node(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
> return of_node_get(opp->np);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_of_node);
> +
> +/**
> + * of_dev_pm_opp_get_cpu_power() - Estimates the power of a CPU
> + * @mW: pointer to the power estimate in milli-watts
> + * @KHz: pointer to the OPP's frequency, in kilo-hertz
> + * @cpu: CPU for which power needs to be estimated
> + *
> + * Computes the power estimated by @CPU at the first OPP above @KHz (ceil),
> + * and updates @KHz and @mW accordingly.
> + *
> + * The power is estimated as P = C * V^2 * f, with C the CPU's capacitance
> + * (read from the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding) and V and f
> + * respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP.
> + *
> + * Return: -ENODEV if the CPU device cannot be found, -EINVAL if the power
> + * calculation failed because of missing parameters, 0 otherwise.
> + */
> +int of_dev_pm_opp_get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW, unsigned long *KHz, int cpu)
I would suggest to change the return type to unsigned long and return 0 for
errors and positive values for mW.
> +{
> + unsigned long mV, Hz, MHz;
MHz is used only once, I think you can get rid of it just open code the division
by 1000000. Maybe remove Hz as well and directly use kHz.
> + struct device *cpu_dev;
> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + u32 cap;
> + u64 tmp;
Name this mW with the above changes.
> + int ret;
> +
> + cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> + if (!cpu_dev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + np = of_node_get(cpu_dev->of_node);
> + if (!np)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "dynamic-power-coefficient", &cap);
> + of_node_put(np);
> + if (ret)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + Hz = *KHz * 1000;
> + opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(cpu_dev, &Hz);
> + if (IS_ERR(opp))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mV = dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(opp) / 1000;
> + dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
> + if (!mV)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + MHz = Hz / 1000000;
> + tmp = (u64)cap * mV * mV * MHz;
> + do_div(tmp, 1000000000);
> +
> + *mW = (unsigned long)tmp;
> + *KHz = Hz / 1000;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dev_pm_opp_get_cpu_power);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> index 0a2a88e5a383..fedde14f5187 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ int dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, struct cpumask *cpuma
> struct device_node *dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(struct device *dev);
> struct device_node *dev_pm_opp_get_of_node(struct dev_pm_opp *opp);
> int of_get_required_opp_performance_state(struct device_node *np, int index);
> +int of_dev_pm_opp_get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW, unsigned long *KHz, int cpu);
> #else
> static inline int dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(struct device *dev)
> {
> @@ -364,6 +365,10 @@ static inline int of_get_required_opp_performance_state(struct device_node *np,
> {
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
Add a blank line here. We missed adding the same before
of_get_required_opp_performance_state() earlier, maybe add the new routine
before of_get_required_opp_performance_state() and add blank line before and
after it :)
> +static inline int of_dev_pm_opp_get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW, unsigned long *KHz, int cpu)
> +{
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +}
> #endif
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_OPP_H__ */
> --
> 2.20.1
--
viresh
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-29 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-28 16:55 [PATCH 0/7] Register an Energy Model for Arm reference platforms Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 19:02 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-29 9:03 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-29 17:52 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-29 5:10 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2019-01-29 9:09 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 19:36 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-29 5:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-29 9:15 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-30 5:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-30 9:12 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-30 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-30 10:20 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-29 5:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-29 9:10 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] cpufreq: scpi: " Quentin Perret
2019-01-29 5:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] cpufreq: scmi: " Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64: dts: juno: Add cpu dynamic-power-coefficient information Quentin Perret
2019-01-29 15:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-01-30 10:23 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm: dts: vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: " Quentin Perret
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190129051030.gu5nhr6vmcd35bzk@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox