Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>
To: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	<mark.rutland@arm.com>,  <labbott@redhat.com>,
	<alex.popov@linux.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: guohanjun@huawei.com, huawei.libin@huawei.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, julien.thierry@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: fix wrong check of on_sdei_stack in nmi context
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:55:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190401035557.22191-1-liwei391@huawei.com> (raw)

When doing unwind_frame() in the context of pseudo nmi (need enable
CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI), reaching the botton of the stack (fp == 0,
pc != 0), function on_sdei_stack() will return true while the sdei acpi
table is not inited in fact. This will cause a "NULL pointer dereference"
oops when going on.

Signed-off-by: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
index 5ba4465e44f0..ea94cf8f9dc6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static bool on_sdei_normal_stack(unsigned long sp, struct stack_info *info)
 	unsigned long low = (unsigned long)raw_cpu_read(sdei_stack_normal_ptr);
 	unsigned long high = low + SDEI_STACK_SIZE;
 
+	if (!low)
+		return false;
+
 	if (sp < low || sp >= high)
 		return false;
 
@@ -111,6 +114,9 @@ static bool on_sdei_critical_stack(unsigned long sp, struct stack_info *info)
 	unsigned long low = (unsigned long)raw_cpu_read(sdei_stack_critical_ptr);
 	unsigned long high = low + SDEI_STACK_SIZE;
 
+	if (!low)
+		return false;
+
 	if (sp < low || sp >= high)
 		return false;
 
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2019-04-01  3:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-01  3:55 Wei Li [this message]
2019-04-01  9:49 ` [PATCH] arm64: fix wrong check of on_sdei_stack in nmi context Julien Thierry
2019-04-01 10:32 ` Heyi Guo
2019-04-02 17:13 ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190401035557.22191-1-liwei391@huawei.com \
    --to=liwei391@huawei.com \
    --cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox