Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
To: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, labbott@redhat.com, alex.popov@linux.com,
	james.morse@arm.com
Cc: huawei.libin@huawei.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	guohanjun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix wrong check of on_sdei_stack in nmi context
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 10:49:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f76f2183-b2fc-48ba-53e4-302950069f5a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190401035557.22191-1-liwei391@huawei.com>

Hi Wei,

On 01/04/2019 04:55, Wei Li wrote:
> When doing unwind_frame() in the context of pseudo nmi (need enable
> CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI), reaching the botton of the stack (fp == 0,
> pc != 0), function on_sdei_stack() will return true while the sdei acpi
> table is not inited in fact. This will cause a "NULL pointer dereference"
> oops when going on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>

Thanks for catching this. The change makes sense to me.

Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
> index 5ba4465e44f0..ea94cf8f9dc6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static bool on_sdei_normal_stack(unsigned long sp, struct stack_info *info)
>  	unsigned long low = (unsigned long)raw_cpu_read(sdei_stack_normal_ptr);
>  	unsigned long high = low + SDEI_STACK_SIZE;
>  
> +	if (!low)
> +		return false;
> +
>  	if (sp < low || sp >= high)
>  		return false;
>  
> @@ -111,6 +114,9 @@ static bool on_sdei_critical_stack(unsigned long sp, struct stack_info *info)
>  	unsigned long low = (unsigned long)raw_cpu_read(sdei_stack_critical_ptr);
>  	unsigned long high = low + SDEI_STACK_SIZE;
>  
> +	if (!low)
> +		return false;
> +
>  	if (sp < low || sp >= high)
>  		return false;
>  
> 

-- 
Julien Thierry

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-01  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-01  3:55 [PATCH] arm64: fix wrong check of on_sdei_stack in nmi context Wei Li
2019-04-01  9:49 ` Julien Thierry [this message]
2019-04-01 10:32 ` Heyi Guo
2019-04-02 17:13 ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f76f2183-b2fc-48ba-53e4-302950069f5a@arm.com \
    --to=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox