Re: next/master build: 230 builds: 5 failed, 225 passed, 6 errors, 1344 warnings (next-20190805)

Re: next/master build: 230 builds: 5 failed, 225 passed, 6 errors, 1344 warnings (next-20190805)

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 686 bytes --]

On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 02:40:32AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:

Today's -next fails to build an arm allmodconfig due to:

> allmodconfig (arm, gcc-8) — FAIL, 2 errors, 16 warnings, 0 section mismatches
> 
> Errors:
>     drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:279:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readb'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:298:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq'; did you mean 'writeb'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

due to 4fa1c6a679bb0 (drm/amdgpu: add RREG64/WREG64(_PCIE) operations)
which introduces use of readq() and writeq().

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: next/master build: 230 builds: 5 failed, 225 passed, 6 errors, 1344 warnings (next-20190805)

[Guenter Roeck]

On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:12:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 02:40:32AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> 
> Today's -next fails to build an arm allmodconfig due to:
> 
> > allmodconfig (arm, gcc-8) — FAIL, 2 errors, 16 warnings, 0 section mismatches
> > 
> > Errors:
> >     drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:279:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readb'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >     drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:298:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq'; did you mean 'writeb'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 
> due to 4fa1c6a679bb0 (drm/amdgpu: add RREG64/WREG64(_PCIE) operations)
> which introduces use of readq() and writeq().

AFAICS this problem affects all 32-bit builds, including i386.
Is it in the process of being fixed, or should we submit a
patch limiting DRM_AMDGPU to 64-bit builds ?

Guenter

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: next/master build: 230 builds: 5 failed, 225 passed, 6 errors, 1344 warnings (next-20190805)

[Alex Deucher]

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:53 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:12:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 02:40:32AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> >
> > Today's -next fails to build an arm allmodconfig due to:
> >
> > > allmodconfig (arm, gcc-8) — FAIL, 2 errors, 16 warnings, 0 section mismatches
> > >
> > > Errors:
> > >     drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:279:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readb'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >     drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:298:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq'; did you mean 'writeb'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >
> > due to 4fa1c6a679bb0 (drm/amdgpu: add RREG64/WREG64(_PCIE) operations)
> > which introduces use of readq() and writeq().
>
> AFAICS this problem affects all 32-bit builds, including i386.
> Is it in the process of being fixed, or should we submit a
> patch limiting DRM_AMDGPU to 64-bit builds ?

Yes, the fix is being discussed here:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/322213/

Alex

>
> Guenter
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: next/master build: 230 builds: 5 failed, 225 passed, 6 errors, 1344 warnings (next-20190805)

[Guenter Roeck]

On 8/8/19 11:53 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:53 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:12:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 02:40:32AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>>>
>>> Today's -next fails to build an arm allmodconfig due to:
>>>
>>>> allmodconfig (arm, gcc-8) — FAIL, 2 errors, 16 warnings, 0 section mismatches
>>>>
>>>> Errors:
>>>>      drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:279:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readb'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>>      drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:298:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq'; did you mean 'writeb'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>
>>> due to 4fa1c6a679bb0 (drm/amdgpu: add RREG64/WREG64(_PCIE) operations)
>>> which introduces use of readq() and writeq().
>>
>> AFAICS this problem affects all 32-bit builds, including i386.
>> Is it in the process of being fixed, or should we submit a
>> patch limiting DRM_AMDGPU to 64-bit builds ?
> 
> Yes, the fix is being discussed here:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/322213/
> 

Please note that this does fail for i386 (32-bit x86) builds, contrary to the information
in that discussion. Also, from looking into the kernel, I only see readq/writeq defined
for arch/x86 in 64-bit mode; see arch/x86/include/asm/io.h.

Guenter

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel