From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of transport type
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:48:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210101851.gpayo7bnyf54opyu@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203120002.GB4171@bogus>
On 03-12-19, 12:00, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> I am more interested in this part. As I am aware the only 2 other
> transport being discussed is SMC/HVC and new/yet conceptual SPCI(built
> on top of SMC/HVC). There are already discussions on the list to make
> former as mailbox[1]. While I see both pros and cons with that approach,
> there's a need to converge. One main advantage I see with SMC/HVC mailbox
> is that it can be used with any other client and not just SCMI. Equally,
> the queuing in the mailbox may not be needed with fast SMC/HVC but may
> be needed for new SPCI(not yet fully analysed).
We were also looking for OPTEE based mailbox which is similar to SPCI.
--
viresh
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-29 9:31 [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of transport type Viresh Kumar
2019-12-03 12:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-10 10:18 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2019-12-09 18:13 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-12-10 5:34 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-12-10 18:46 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-11 2:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-12-31 2:50 ` Peng Fan
2019-12-31 12:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-31 20:09 ` Jassi Brar
2020-01-06 11:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-09 8:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-09 9:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-10 12:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-09 9:34 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-09 10:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-10 12:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-13 6:45 ` Peng Fan
2020-01-10 12:31 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210101851.gpayo7bnyf54opyu@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox