From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
shan.gavin@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Reject invalid NUMA option
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:25:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200428072509.GA4049@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e85ea83-de5f-c789-2e3c-e468a50ed4bd@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 02:35:20PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On 4/28/20 1:09 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > Could this be a bug in the implementation of strncmp() in
> > arch/arm64/lib/strncmp.S. As I don't know arm64 assembly, I have no idea
> > what it is trying to do.
> >
> > But strncmp("o","off",3) returning zero *is* a bug.
> >
>
> I think it's false alarm. The patch has been in my local repo for a while.
> I checked out 5.7.rc3 and tried passing "numa=o" to the kernel, @numa_off
> is unchanged and its value is false. I also check the return value from
> strncmp() as below, it's correct. Nothing is broken. I should have retested
> before posting it. Sorry for the noise. Please ignore the crap patch :)
Hmm, it's still worrying that you had that patch kicking around though, as
it sounds like it /used/ to be broken. Would you be able to test the LTS
kernels (5.4, 4.19, 4.14, 4.9, 4.4) to check that we're not missing a
backport, please? Sorry to be a pain, but I'd like to get to the bottom of
this!
Thanks,
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-28 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-24 4:53 [PATCH] arm64/mm: Reject invalid NUMA option Gavin Shan
2020-04-24 10:11 ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-28 0:59 ` Gavin Shan
2020-04-28 2:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-28 2:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-28 3:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-28 4:35 ` Gavin Shan
2020-04-28 7:25 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-04-28 8:56 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200428072509.GA4049@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox