public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-common-proc-board: Add mailboxes to C66x DSPs
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:42:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200820114238.7ovvxq5n3fogzowi@akan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200820010331.2911-3-s-anna@ti.com>

On 20:03-20200819, Suman Anna wrote:
> Add the required 'mboxes' property to both the C66x DSP processors on the
> TI J721E common processor board. The mailboxes and some shared memory

I am not sure I understand the logic here. The carveout is added to
p0 SOM - and the mbox is added to common_proc_board. I am not sure I
get the difference. The C66x processors are on the SoC, stack is as
follows: - SoC - SoM - Common Proc board

I am just wondering if the carveouts and mbox linkage should be in the
common processor board? if that makes sense at all? I know we already
have other definitions.. Trying to see if we are making it harder to
understand the definition than that is necessary..

> are required for running the Remote Processor Messaging (RPMsg) stack
> between the host processor and each of the R5Fs. The chosen sub-mailboxes
> match the values used in the current firmware images. This can be changed,
> if needed, as per the system integration needs after making appropriate
> changes on the firmware side as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts
> index e8fc01d97ada..ff541dc09eca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts
> @@ -379,6 +379,14 @@ &mailbox0_cluster11 {
>  	status = "disabled";
>  };
>  
> +&c66_0 {
> +	mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster3 &mbox_c66_0>;
> +};
> +
> +&c66_1 {
> +	mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster3 &mbox_c66_1>;
> +};
> +
>  &main_sdhci0 {
>  	/* eMMC */
>  	non-removable;
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-20 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-20  1:03 [PATCH 0/7] Add C66x & C71x DSP nodes on J721E SoCs Suman Anna
2020-08-20  1:03 ` [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-main: Add C66x DSP nodes Suman Anna
2020-08-20  1:03 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-common-proc-board: Add mailboxes to C66x DSPs Suman Anna
2020-08-20 11:42   ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2020-08-20 13:25     ` Suman Anna
2020-08-20 19:03       ` Nishanth Menon
2020-08-24 22:00         ` Suman Anna
2020-08-25 10:42           ` Nishanth Menon
2020-08-25 17:25             ` Suman Anna
2020-08-20  1:03 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-som-p0: Add DDR carveout memory nodes for C66 DSPs Suman Anna
2020-08-20  1:03 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-main: Add C71x DSP node Suman Anna
2020-08-20  1:03 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-common-proc-board: Add mailboxes to C71x DSP Suman Anna
2020-08-20  1:03 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-som-p0: Add DDR carveout memory nodes for " Suman Anna
2020-08-20  1:03 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-som-p0: Reserve memory for IPC between RTOS cores Suman Anna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200820114238.7ovvxq5n3fogzowi@akan \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=s-anna@ti.com \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox