Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-main: Add PCIe device tree nodes
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:52:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200901145204.ayybrzqjcfhiqnfq@akan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200901140628.8800-2-kishon@ti.com>

On 19:36-20200901, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Add PCIe device tree node (both RC and EP) for the four
> PCIe instances here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi | 218 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e.dtsi      |   5 +-
>  2 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


Did you look at the diff of the dtbs_check before and after this
series? I see: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/9fyfrTjx9M/

> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi
> index 00a36a14efe7..a36909d8b8c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi
> @@ -28,6 +28,26 @@
>  		#size-cells = <1>;
>  		ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x00100000 0x1c000>;
>  
> +		pcie0_ctrl: pcie-ctrl@4070 {
https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/releases/download/v0.3/devicetree-specification-v0.3.pdf
Section 2.2.2: why not use syscon@4070 and so on?

> +			compatible = "syscon";
> +			reg = <0x00004070 0x4>;
> +		};
> +
> +		pcie1_ctrl: pcie-ctrl@4074 {
> +			compatible = "syscon";
> +			reg = <0x00004074 0x4>;
> +		};
> +
> +		pcie2_ctrl: pcie-ctrl@4078 {
> +			compatible = "syscon";
> +			reg = <0x00004078 0x4>;
> +		};
> +
> +		pcie3_ctrl: pcie-ctrl@407c {
> +			compatible = "syscon";
> +			reg = <0x0000407c 0x4>;
> +		};
> +
>  		serdes_ln_ctrl: serdes-ln-ctrl@4080 {
>  			compatible = "mmio-mux";
>  			reg = <0x00004080 0x50>;
> @@ -576,6 +596,204 @@
>  		};
>  	};
>  
> +	pcie0_rc: pcie@2900000 {
> +		compatible = "ti,j721e-pcie-host";
> +		reg = <0x00 0x02900000 0x00 0x1000>,
> +		      <0x00 0x02907000 0x00 0x400>,
> +		      <0x00 0x0d000000 0x00 0x00800000>,
> +		      <0x00 0x10000000 0x00 0x00001000>;
> +		reg-names = "intd_cfg", "user_cfg", "reg", "cfg";
> +		interrupt-names = "link_state";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 318 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> +		device_type = "pci";
> +		ti,syscon-pcie-ctrl = <&pcie0_ctrl>;
> +		max-link-speed = <3>;
> +		num-lanes = <2>;
> +		power-domains = <&k3_pds 239 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> +		clocks = <&k3_clks 239 1>;
> +		clock-names = "fck";
> +		#address-cells = <3>;
> +		#size-cells = <2>;
> +		bus-range = <0x0 0xf>;
> +		vendor-id = <0x104c>;
> +		device-id = <0xb00d>;
> +		msi-map = <0x0 &gic_its 0x0 0x10000>;
> +		dma-coherent;
> +		ranges = <0x01000000 0x0 0x10001000 0x0 0x10001000 0x0 0x0010000>,
> +			 <0x02000000 0x0 0x10011000 0x0 0x10011000 0x0 0x7fef000>;
> +		dma-ranges = <0x02000000 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x10000 0x0>;
> +	};
> +
> +	pcie0_ep: pcie-ep@2900000 {
Not related to this patch, but just a suggestion: pcie-ep -> do we
need to add that to the Generic names in DT spec?

[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e.dtsi
> index f787aa73aaae..eeb02115b966 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e.dtsi
> @@ -132,9 +132,12 @@
>  			 <0x00 0x06400000 0x00 0x06400000 0x00 0x00400000>, /* USBSS1 */
>  			 <0x00 0x01000000 0x00 0x01000000 0x00 0x0af02400>, /* Most peripherals */
>  			 <0x00 0x30000000 0x00 0x30000000 0x00 0x0c400000>, /* MAIN NAVSS */
> -			 <0x00 0x0d000000 0x00 0x0d000000 0x00 0x01000000>, /* PCIe Core*/
> +			 <0x00 0x0d000000 0x00 0x0d000000 0x00 0x01800000>, /* PCIe Core*/
> +			 <0x00 0x0e000000 0x00 0x0e000000 0x00 0x01800000>, /* PCIe Core*/
>  			 <0x00 0x10000000 0x00 0x10000000 0x00 0x10000000>, /* PCIe DAT */
										^^
									should be PCIe1?
Just because you are introducing PCIe2,3 in this patch, the net result
does'nt look consistent? Also might want to cover this change in the
$commit_message.
[...]
>  			 <0x00 0x64800000 0x00 0x64800000 0x00 0x00800000>, /* C71 */
> +			 <0x44 0x00000000 0x44 0x00000000 0x00 0x08000000>, /* PCIe2 DAT */
> +			 <0x44 0x10000000 0x44 0x10000000 0x00 0x08000000>, /* PCIe3 DAT */
>  			 <0x4d 0x80800000 0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00800000>, /* C66_0 */
>  			 <0x4d 0x81800000 0x4d 0x81800000 0x00 0x00800000>, /* C66_1 */
>  			 <0x4e 0x20000000 0x4e 0x20000000 0x00 0x00080000>, /* GPU */
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-01 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-01 14:06 [RESEND PATCH 0/2] Add DT to get PCIe working in J721E SoC Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-09-01 14:06 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-main: Add PCIe device tree nodes Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-09-01 14:52   ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2020-09-02  4:54     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-09-02  7:37       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-09-14 11:23         ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-09-14 11:52           ` Nishanth Menon
2020-09-14 12:13             ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-09-14 13:14               ` Nishanth Menon
2020-09-14 14:58                 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-09-01 14:06 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-common-proc-board: Configure the PCIe instances Kishon Vijay Abraham I

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200901145204.ayybrzqjcfhiqnfq@akan \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox