From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] kvm: arm64: Remove __hyp_this_cpu_read
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 18:30:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200929173053.GB14317@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922204910.7265-5-dbrazdil@google.com>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 09:49:04PM +0100, David Brazdil wrote:
> this_cpu_ptr is meant for use in kernel proper because it selects between
> TPIDR_EL1/2 based on nVHE/VHE. __hyp_this_cpu_ptr was used in hyp to always
> select TPIDR_EL2. Unify all users behind this_cpu_ptr and friends by
> selecting _EL2 register under __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__. VHE continues
> selecting the register using alternatives.
>
> Under CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT, the kernel helpers perform a preemption check
> which is omitted by the hyp helpers. Preserve the behavior for nVHE by
> overriding the corresponding macros under __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__. Extend
> the checks into VHE hyp code.
>
> Acked-by: Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 20 ----------------
> arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/debug-sr.h | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 8 +++----
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/sysreg-sr.c | 4 ++--
> 7 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
Looks good, thanks for the respin!
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-29 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-22 20:49 [PATCH v4 00/10] Independent per-CPU data section for nVHE David Brazdil
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] kvm: arm64: Partially link nVHE hyp code, simplify HYPCOPY David Brazdil
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] kvm: arm64: Move nVHE hyp namespace macros to hyp_image.h David Brazdil
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] kvm: arm64: Only define __kvm_ex_table for CONFIG_KVM David Brazdil
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] kvm: arm64: Remove __hyp_this_cpu_read David Brazdil
2020-09-29 17:30 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] kvm: arm64: Remove hyp_adr/ldr_this_cpu David Brazdil
2020-09-29 17:34 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-29 17:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] kvm: arm64: Add helpers for accessing nVHE hyp per-cpu vars David Brazdil
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] kvm: arm64: Duplicate arm64_ssbd_callback_required for nVHE hyp David Brazdil
2020-09-29 17:37 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] kvm: arm64: Create separate instances of kvm_host_data for VHE/nVHE David Brazdil
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] kvm: arm64: Set up hyp percpu data for nVHE David Brazdil
2020-09-29 17:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] kvm: arm64: Remove unnecessary hyp mappings David Brazdil
2020-09-29 17:49 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-24 10:10 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] Independent per-CPU data section for nVHE Christopher Lameter
2020-10-02 8:19 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200929173053.GB14317@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ascull@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox