Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] kvm: arm64: Remove hyp_adr/ldr_this_cpu
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 18:34:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200929173407.GC14317@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922204910.7265-6-dbrazdil@google.com>

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 09:49:05PM +0100, David Brazdil wrote:
> The hyp_adr/ldr_this_cpu helpers were introduced for use in hyp code
> because they always needed to use TPIDR_EL2 for base, while
> adr/ldr_this_cpu from kernel proper would select between TPIDR_EL2 and
> _EL1 based on VHE/nVHE.
> 
> Simplify this now that the hyp mode case can be handled using the
> __KVM_VHE/NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ macros.
> 
> Acked-by: Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h   | 14 +-------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S     |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> index 54d181177656..86e0ef79a799 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -218,6 +218,23 @@ lr	.req	x30		// link register
>  	str	\src, [\tmp, :lo12:\sym]
>  	.endm
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * @dst: destination register (32 or 64 bit wide)

nit: this comment is wrong as I don't think mrs can take a W register
as the destination argument. I'm assuming Marc can fix that up.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-29 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-22 20:49 [PATCH v4 00/10] Independent per-CPU data section for nVHE David Brazdil
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] kvm: arm64: Partially link nVHE hyp code, simplify HYPCOPY David Brazdil
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] kvm: arm64: Move nVHE hyp namespace macros to hyp_image.h David Brazdil
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] kvm: arm64: Only define __kvm_ex_table for CONFIG_KVM David Brazdil
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] kvm: arm64: Remove __hyp_this_cpu_read David Brazdil
2020-09-29 17:30   ` Will Deacon
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] kvm: arm64: Remove hyp_adr/ldr_this_cpu David Brazdil
2020-09-29 17:34   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-09-29 17:46     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] kvm: arm64: Add helpers for accessing nVHE hyp per-cpu vars David Brazdil
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] kvm: arm64: Duplicate arm64_ssbd_callback_required for nVHE hyp David Brazdil
2020-09-29 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] kvm: arm64: Create separate instances of kvm_host_data for VHE/nVHE David Brazdil
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] kvm: arm64: Set up hyp percpu data for nVHE David Brazdil
2020-09-29 17:50   ` Will Deacon
2020-09-22 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] kvm: arm64: Remove unnecessary hyp mappings David Brazdil
2020-09-29 17:49   ` Will Deacon
2020-09-24 10:10 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] Independent per-CPU data section for nVHE Christopher Lameter
2020-10-02  8:19 ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200929173407.GC14317@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ascull@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox