From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com,
arnaud.pouliquen@st.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/16] remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 11:03:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210301180357.GA3690389@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d21bebd0-6cf0-bc9d-c945-5e6aa2e5271d@foss.st.com>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 05:14:36PM +0100, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
Good morning,
> On 2/24/21 12:35 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Add a new get_loaded_rsc_table() operation in order to support
> > scenarios where the remoteproc core has booted a remote processor
> > and detaches from it. When re-attaching to the remote processor,
> > the core needs to know where the resource table has been placed
> > in memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > New for V6:
> > - Don't return an error if a resource table doesn't exist.
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 10 ++++++++
> > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 6 ++++-
> > 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > index 8c7e9f1d50d7..0012b7bdce24 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > @@ -1537,6 +1537,32 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
> > +{
> > + struct resource_table *table_ptr;
> > + struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > + size_t table_sz;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + table_ptr = rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, &table_sz);
> > + if (!table_ptr) {
> > + /* Not having a resource table is acceptable */
> > + return 0;
>
> Would it be an over protection to set rproc->table_ptr to NULL here?
>
I thought about that too but since memory for @rproc is allocated with kzalloc()
it wouldn't provide anything more.
> else
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Arnaud
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (IS_ERR(table_ptr)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(table_ptr);
> > + dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> > + rproc->table_ptr = table_ptr;
> > + rproc->table_sz = table_sz;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
> > * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
> > @@ -1556,6 +1582,12 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > + ret = rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
> > + goto disable_iommu;
> > + }
> > +
> > /* reset max_notifyid */
> > rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > index c34002888d2c..4f73aac7e60d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > @@ -177,6 +177,16 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline
> > +struct resource_table *rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> > + size_t *size)
> > +{
> > + if (rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table)
> > + return rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, size);
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline
> > bool rproc_u64_fit_in_size_t(u64 val)
> > {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > index 6b0a0ed30a03..51538a7d120d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > @@ -368,7 +368,9 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
> > * RSC_HANDLED if resource was handled, RSC_IGNORED if not handled and a
> > * negative value on error
> > * @load_rsc_table: load resource table from firmware image
> > - * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resouce table
> > + * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resource table from firmware image
> > + * @get_loaded_rsc_table: get resource table installed in memory
> > + * by external entity
> > * @load: load firmware to memory, where the remote processor
> > * expects to find it
> > * @sanity_check: sanity check the fw image
> > @@ -390,6 +392,8 @@ struct rproc_ops {
> > int offset, int avail);
> > struct resource_table *(*find_loaded_rsc_table)(
> > struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > + struct resource_table *(*get_loaded_rsc_table)(
> > + struct rproc *rproc, size_t *size);
> > int (*load)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > int (*sanity_check)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > u64 (*get_boot_addr)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> >
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-01 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-23 23:34 [PATCH v6 00/16] remoteproc: Add support for detaching a remote processor Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 01/16] remoteproc: Remove useless check in rproc_del() Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 02/16] remoteproc: Rename function rproc_actuate() Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 03/16] remoteproc: Add new RPROC_ATTACHED state Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 04/16] remoteproc: Properly represent the attached state Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 05/16] remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:14 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-03-01 18:03 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 06/16] remoteproc: stm32: Move resource table setup " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:14 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 07/16] remoteproc: stm32: Move memory parsing " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 08/16] remoteproc: Add new detach() remoteproc operation Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 09/16] remoteproc: Introduce function __rproc_detach() Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:15 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 10/16] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_detach() Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:15 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 11/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table when attached Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:21 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-03-01 18:41 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 12/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with a kernel panic " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 13/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with a start request " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 14/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with a stop " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:21 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 15/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with a detach " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:21 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 16/16] remoteproc: Refactor rproc delete and cdev release path Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:23 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-03-01 18:58 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:40 ` [PATCH v6 00/16] remoteproc: Add support for detaching a remote processor Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-03-01 18:58 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210301180357.GA3690389@xps15 \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox