public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com,
	arnaud.pouliquen@st.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/16] remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 11:03:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210301180357.GA3690389@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d21bebd0-6cf0-bc9d-c945-5e6aa2e5271d@foss.st.com>

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 05:14:36PM +0100, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
> 

Good morning,

> On 2/24/21 12:35 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Add a new get_loaded_rsc_table() operation in order to support
> > scenarios where the remoteproc core has booted a remote processor
> > and detaches from it.  When re-attaching to the remote processor,
> > the core needs to know where the resource table has been placed
> > in memory.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > New for V6:
> > - Don't return an error if a resource table doesn't exist.
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 10 ++++++++
> >  include/linux/remoteproc.h               |  6 ++++-
> >  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > index 8c7e9f1d50d7..0012b7bdce24 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > @@ -1537,6 +1537,32 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
> > +{
> > +	struct resource_table *table_ptr;
> > +	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > +	size_t table_sz;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	table_ptr = rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, &table_sz);
> > +	if (!table_ptr) {
> > +		/* Not having a resource table is acceptable */
> > +		return 0;
> 
> Would it be an over protection to set rproc->table_ptr to NULL here?
> 

I thought about that too but since memory for @rproc is allocated with kzalloc()
it wouldn't provide anything more. 

> else
> 
> Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> Arnaud
> 
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (IS_ERR(table_ptr)) {
> > +		ret = PTR_ERR(table_ptr);
> > +		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> > +	rproc->table_ptr = table_ptr;
> > +	rproc->table_sz = table_sz;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
> >   * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
> > @@ -1556,6 +1582,12 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> >  		return ret;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	ret = rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
> > +		goto disable_iommu;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	/* reset max_notifyid */
> >  	rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > index c34002888d2c..4f73aac7e60d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > @@ -177,6 +177,16 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline
> > +struct resource_table *rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> > +						  size_t *size)
> > +{
> > +	if (rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table)
> > +		return rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, size);
> > +
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline
> >  bool rproc_u64_fit_in_size_t(u64 val)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > index 6b0a0ed30a03..51538a7d120d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > @@ -368,7 +368,9 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
> >   * RSC_HANDLED if resource was handled, RSC_IGNORED if not handled and a
> >   * negative value on error
> >   * @load_rsc_table:	load resource table from firmware image
> > - * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resouce table
> > + * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resource table from firmware image
> > + * @get_loaded_rsc_table: get resource table installed in memory
> > + *			  by external entity
> >   * @load:		load firmware to memory, where the remote processor
> >   *			expects to find it
> >   * @sanity_check:	sanity check the fw image
> > @@ -390,6 +392,8 @@ struct rproc_ops {
> >  			  int offset, int avail);
> >  	struct resource_table *(*find_loaded_rsc_table)(
> >  				struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > +	struct resource_table *(*get_loaded_rsc_table)(
> > +				struct rproc *rproc, size_t *size);
> >  	int (*load)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> >  	int (*sanity_check)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> >  	u64 (*get_boot_addr)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-01 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-23 23:34 [PATCH v6 00/16] remoteproc: Add support for detaching a remote processor Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 01/16] remoteproc: Remove useless check in rproc_del() Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 02/16] remoteproc: Rename function rproc_actuate() Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 03/16] remoteproc: Add new RPROC_ATTACHED state Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 04/16] remoteproc: Properly represent the attached state Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 05/16] remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:14   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-03-01 18:03     ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 06/16] remoteproc: stm32: Move resource table setup " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:14   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 07/16] remoteproc: stm32: Move memory parsing " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 08/16] remoteproc: Add new detach() remoteproc operation Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 09/16] remoteproc: Introduce function __rproc_detach() Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:15   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 10/16] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_detach() Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:15   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 11/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table when attached Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:21   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-03-01 18:41     ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 12/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with a kernel panic " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 13/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with a start request " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 14/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with a stop " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:21   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 15/16] remoteproc: Properly deal with a detach " Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:21   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-23 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 16/16] remoteproc: Refactor rproc delete and cdev release path Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:23   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-03-01 18:58     ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-26 16:40 ` [PATCH v6 00/16] remoteproc: Add support for detaching a remote processor Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-03-01 18:58   ` Mathieu Poirier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210301180357.GA3690389@xps15 \
    --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox