public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: barrier: Remove spec_bar() macro
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:13:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210325141304.1607595-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> (raw)

The spec_bar() macro was introduced in
commit bd4fb6d270bc ("arm64: Add support for SB barrier and patch in over DSB; ISB sequences")
as a way for C to insert a speculation barrier and was then
used in one single place: set_fs().

Later on
commit 3d2403fd10a1 ("arm64: uaccess: remove set_fs()")
deleted set_fs() altogether and as noted in the commit
on the new path the regular sb() assembly macro will
be used.

Delete the remnant.

Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Fixes: 3d2403fd10a1 ("arm64: uaccess: remove set_fs()")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
index c3009b0e5239..bab29932d21b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -25,10 +25,6 @@
 #define psb_csync()	asm volatile("hint #17" : : : "memory")
 #define csdb()		asm volatile("hint #20" : : : "memory")
 
-#define spec_bar()	asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("dsb nsh\nisb\n",		\
-						 SB_BARRIER_INSN"nop\n",	\
-						 ARM64_HAS_SB))
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
 #define pmr_sync()						\
 	do {							\
-- 
2.29.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-25 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-25 14:13 Linus Walleij [this message]
2021-03-25 14:34 ` [PATCH] arm64: barrier: Remove spec_bar() macro Mark Rutland
2021-03-26 11:06 ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210325141304.1607595-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox