Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	steven.price@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] firmware: smccc: Fix check for ARCH_SOC_ID not implemented
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:35:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211122083503.umkqv2t75osypsbx@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1637365141-16823-1-git-send-email-mikelley@microsoft.com>

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 03:39:01PM -0800, Michael Kelley wrote:
> The ARCH_FEATURES function ID is a 32-bit SMC call, which returns
> a 32-bit result per the SMCCC spec.  Current code is doing a 64-bit
> comparison against -1 (SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED) to detect that the
> feature is unimplemented.  That check doesn't work in a Hyper-V VM,
> where the upper 32-bits are zero as allowed by the spec.
> 
> Cast the result as an 'int' so the comparison works. The change also
> makes the code consistent with other similar checks in this file.
> 
> Fixes: 821b67fa4639 ("firmware: smccc: Add ARCH_SOC_ID support")

Good catch.

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

Can you please re-post with my review tag keeping arm@kernel.org and
soc@kernel.org ? I don't have any other fixes at the moment, we can
ask SoC maintainers to fix this up directly.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-22  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-19 23:39 [PATCH 1/1] firmware: smccc: Fix check for ARCH_SOC_ID not implemented Michael Kelley
2021-11-22  8:35 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2021-11-22 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-22 11:52     ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211122083503.umkqv2t75osypsbx@bogus \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox