public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
	sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v12 06/10] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures
Date: Mon,  3 Jan 2022 10:52:08 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220103165212.9303-7-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220103165212.9303-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

Change the loop in unwind()
===========================

Change the unwind loop in unwind() to:

	while (unwind_continue(state))
		unwind_next(state);

This is easy to understand and maintain.

New function unwind_continue()
==============================

Define a new function unwind_continue() that is used in the unwind loop
to check for conditions that terminate a stack trace.

The conditions checked are:

	- If the bottom of the stack (final frame) has been reached,
	  terminate.

	- If the consume_entry() function returns false, the caller of
	  unwind has asked to terminate the stack trace. So, terminate.

	- If unwind_next() failed for some reason (like stack corruption),
	  terminate.

Do not return an error value from unwind_next()
===============================================

We want to check for terminating conditions only in unwind_continue() from
the unwinder loop. So, do not return an error value from unwind_next().
Simply set a flag in unwind_state and check the flag in unwind_continue().

Final FP
========

Introduce a new field "final_fp" in "struct unwind_state". Initialize this
to the final frame of the stack trace:

	task_pt_regs(task)->stackframe

This is where the stacktrace must terminate if it is successful. Add an
explicit comment to that effect.

Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h |  6 +++
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c      | 70 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 322817d40a75..9d1fddc26586 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ struct stack_info {
  * @consume_pc   Consume PC function pointer.
  *
  * @cookie       Argument to consume_pc().
+ *
+ * @final_fp	 Pointer to the final frame.
+ *
+ * @failed:      Unwind failed.
  */
 struct unwind_state {
 	unsigned long fp;
@@ -73,6 +77,8 @@ struct unwind_state {
 	struct pt_regs *regs;
 	stack_trace_consume_fn consume_pc;
 	void *cookie;
+	unsigned long final_fp;
+	bool failed;
 };
 
 extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 3ecb8242caa5..af0949f028c9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
 	bitmap_zero(state->stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES);
 	state->prev_fp = 0;
 	state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
+	state->failed = false;
+
+	/* Stack trace terminates here. */
+	state->final_fp = (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(task)->stackframe;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -94,6 +98,23 @@ static inline void unwind_init_task(struct unwind_state *state)
 	state->pc = thread_saved_pc(state->task);
 }
 
+static bool notrace unwind_continue(struct unwind_state *state)
+{
+	if (state->failed) {
+		/* PC is suspect. Cannot consume it. */
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	if (!state->consume_pc(state->cookie, state->pc)) {
+		/* Caller terminated the unwind. */
+		state->failed = true;
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return state->fp != state->final_fp;
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_continue);
+
 /*
  * Unwind from one frame record (A) to the next frame record (B).
  *
@@ -101,24 +122,26 @@ static inline void unwind_init_task(struct unwind_state *state)
  * records (e.g. a cycle), determined based on the location and fp value of A
  * and the location (but not the fp value) of B.
  */
-static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
+static void notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 {
 	struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
 	unsigned long fp = state->fp;
 	struct stack_info info;
 
-	/* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
-	if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
-		return -ENOENT;
-
-	if (fp & 0x7)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (fp & 0x7) {
+		state->failed = true;
+		return;
+	}
 
-	if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, &info))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, &info)) {
+		state->failed = true;
+		return;
+	}
 
-	if (test_bit(info.type, state->stacks_done))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (test_bit(info.type, state->stacks_done)) {
+		state->failed = true;
+		return;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * As stacks grow downward, any valid record on the same stack must be
@@ -134,8 +157,10 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 	 * stack.
 	 */
 	if (info.type == state->prev_type) {
-		if (fp <= state->prev_fp)
-			return -EINVAL;
+		if (fp <= state->prev_fp) {
+			state->failed = true;
+			return;
+		}
 	} else {
 		set_bit(state->prev_type, state->stacks_done);
 	}
@@ -163,8 +188,10 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 		 */
 		orig_pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(tsk, NULL, state->pc,
 						(void *)state->fp);
-		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(state->pc == orig_pc))
-			return -EINVAL;
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(state->pc == orig_pc)) {
+			state->failed = true;
+			return;
+		}
 		state->pc = orig_pc;
 	}
 #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
@@ -172,22 +199,13 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 	if (is_kretprobe_trampoline(state->pc))
 		state->pc = kretprobe_find_ret_addr(tsk, (void *)state->fp, &state->kr_cur);
 #endif
-
-	return 0;
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
 
 static void notrace unwind(struct unwind_state *state)
 {
-	while (1) {
-		int ret;
-
-		if (!state->consume_pc(state->cookie, state->pc))
-			break;
-		ret = unwind_next(state);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			break;
-	}
+	while (unwind_continue(state))
+		unwind_next(state);
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind);
 
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-03 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <0d0eb36f348fb5a6af6eb592c0525f6e94007328>
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 00/10] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 01/10] arm64: Remove NULL task check from unwind_frame() madvenka
2022-01-06 16:07     ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 02/10] arm64: Rename unwinder functions madvenka
2022-01-06 16:10     ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 03/10] arm64: Rename stackframe to unwind_state madvenka
2022-01-04 14:59     ` Mark Brown
2022-01-06 16:11     ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 04/10] arm64: Split unwind_init() madvenka
2022-01-06 16:31     ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-06 20:13       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 05/10] arm64: Copy unwind arguments to unwind_state madvenka
2022-01-05 16:57     ` Mark Brown
2022-01-06 16:37     ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-06 20:17       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-03 16:52   ` madvenka [this message]
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 07/10] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2022-01-05 16:58     ` Mark Brown
2022-01-05 23:58       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-06 11:43         ` Mark Brown
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 08/10] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 09/10] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 10/10] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE madvenka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220103165212.9303-7-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox