public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org,
	nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/10] arm64: Remove NULL task check from unwind_frame()
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:07:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdcTq8sk/q1zW8va@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220103165212.9303-2-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 10:52:03AM -0600, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote:
> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Currently, there is a check for a NULL task in unwind_frame(). It is not
> needed since all current consumers pass a non-NULL task.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index 0fb58fed54cb..5f5bb35b7b41 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -69,9 +69,6 @@ static int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk,
>  	unsigned long fp = frame->fp;
>  	struct stack_info info;
>  
> -	if (!tsk)
> -		tsk = current;
> -
>  	/* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
>  	if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
>  		return -ENOENT;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-06 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <0d0eb36f348fb5a6af6eb592c0525f6e94007328>
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 00/10] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 01/10] arm64: Remove NULL task check from unwind_frame() madvenka
2022-01-06 16:07     ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 02/10] arm64: Rename unwinder functions madvenka
2022-01-06 16:10     ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 03/10] arm64: Rename stackframe to unwind_state madvenka
2022-01-04 14:59     ` Mark Brown
2022-01-06 16:11     ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 04/10] arm64: Split unwind_init() madvenka
2022-01-06 16:31     ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-06 20:13       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 05/10] arm64: Copy unwind arguments to unwind_state madvenka
2022-01-05 16:57     ` Mark Brown
2022-01-06 16:37     ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-06 20:17       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 06/10] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 07/10] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2022-01-05 16:58     ` Mark Brown
2022-01-05 23:58       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-06 11:43         ` Mark Brown
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 08/10] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 09/10] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52   ` [PATCH v12 10/10] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE madvenka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YdcTq8sk/q1zW8va@FVFF77S0Q05N \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox