Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	acme@kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf arm-spe: Use advertised caps/min_interval as default sample_period
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:14:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220223011436.GA414932@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220221171042.58460-1-german.gomez@arm.com>

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:10:42PM +0000, German Gomez wrote:
> When recording SPE traces, the default sample_period is currently being
> set to 1 in the perf_event_attr fields, instead of the value advertised
> in '/sys/devices/arm_spe_0/caps/min_interval':
> 
> Before:
> 
> $ perf record -e arm_spe// -vv -- sleep 1
> [...]
>   { sample_period, sample_freq }   1
> [...]
> 
> Use the value from the above sysfs location as a more sensible default
> (it was already being read, but the value not being used)
> 
> After:
> 
> $ perf record -e arm_spe// -vv -- sleep 1
> [...]
>   { sample_period, sample_freq }   1024
> [...]
> 
> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>

The change looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-23  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-21 17:10 [PATCH] perf arm-spe: Use advertised caps/min_interval as default sample_period German Gomez
2022-02-23  1:14 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2022-02-23 10:02   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220223011436.GA414932@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s \
    --to=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=german.gomez@arm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox