From: Conor Dooley <mail@conchuod.ie>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>,
Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>,
Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Subject: [PATCH/RFC 0/4] Fix RISC-V's arch-topology reporting
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 23:04:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220707220436.4105443-1-mail@conchuod.ie> (raw)
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Hey all,
It's my first time messing around with arch/ code at all, let alone
more than one arch, so forgive me if I have screwed up how to do a
migration like this.
The goal here is the fix the incorrectly reported arch topology on
RISC-V which seems to have been broken since it was added.
cpu, package and thread IDs are all currently reported as -1, so tools
like lstopo think systems have multiple threads on the same core when
this is not true:
https://github.com/open-mpi/hwloc/issues/536
Because I want to backport that fix, I implemented store_cpu_topology
for RISC-V before migrating to the generic version which seems to have
just complicated things, but was Sudeep's preferred way of doing it.
Palmer, I have not marked the first patch as RFC because I would like
it to be taken as a fix for 5.19-rc(late) independently of the rest if
possible.
The rest of the series is RFC b/c I don't know what I am doing ;)
I only built tested for arm64, so hopefully it is not broken when used.
Thanks,
Conor.
Conor Dooley (4):
riscv: arch-topology: fix default topology reporting
arch-topology: add a default implementation of store_cpu_topology()
riscv: arch-topology: move riscv to the generic store_cpu_topology()
arm64: arch-topology move arm64 to the generic store_cpu_topology()
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 16 ++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 40 -----------------------------------
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 4 +++-
drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++
include/linux/arch_topology.h | 1 +
6 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
base-commit: b6f1f2fa2bddd69ff46a190b8120bd440fd50563
--
2.37.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2022-07-07 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-07 22:04 Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-07-07 22:04 ` [RFC 1/4] riscv: arch-topology: fix default topology reporting Conor Dooley
2022-07-07 22:04 ` [RFC 2/4] arch-topology: add a default implementation of store_cpu_topology() Conor Dooley
2022-07-08 8:24 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-08 8:35 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-08 9:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-08 9:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-08 9:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-08 10:03 ` Greg KH
2022-07-08 11:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-08 11:57 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-08 13:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-08 10:02 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-07 22:04 ` [RFC 3/4] riscv: arch-topology: move riscv to the generic store_cpu_topology() Conor Dooley
2022-07-07 22:04 ` [RFC 4/4] arm64: arch-topology move arm64 " Conor Dooley
2022-07-07 22:06 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/4] Fix RISC-V's arch-topology reporting Conor.Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220707220436.4105443-1-mail@conchuod.ie \
--to=mail@conchuod.ie \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=changbin.du@intel.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=hahnjo@hahnjo.de \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kernel@esmil.dk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox