From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Conor Dooley <mail@conchuod.ie>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Qing Wang <wangqing@vivo.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/21] arch_topology: Add support to parse and detect cache attributes
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:05:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220719150513.a525arh663qlhkob@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73f9d00c-b64c-7c70-c49f-99d3894fad24@conchuod.ie>
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 03:37:22PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On 19/07/2022 15:22, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep,
> >
>
> Hey Geert,
>
[...]
> >
> > This is triggered
> >
> > Early cacheinfo failed, ret = -12
> >
> > on all my RV64 platforms (K210, PolarFire, StarLight).
>
> This should be fixed by Sudeeps most recent patchset, at least
> it was when I tested it!
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220713133344.1201247-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com/
>
Conor you beat me in the response speed :).
> > -12 = -ENOMEM.
> >
> > The boot continues regardless, and the K210 even has enough spare
> > RAM after boot to run "ls", unlike two weeks ago ;-)
> >
Yes Conor initially reported this and I suspected something to do with
per-cpu allocation as the early cacheinfo failed but succeeded in device
initcall level. However when fixing some hotplug issue, I moved the
detection of cache attributes on all cpus from boot cpu to individual
CPUs in the secondary startup which seem to fix the issue as I assume the
per-cpu allocation is ready to use at that stage.
However we still have one pending issue[0] to address even after [1], but
that doesn't affect DT platforms.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220718174151.GA462603@roeck-us.net/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220715102609.2160689-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com/
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-19 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-04 10:15 [PATCH v6 00/21] arch_topology: Updates to add socket support and fix cluster ids Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 01/21] ACPI: PPTT: Use table offset as fw_token instead of virtual address Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 02/21] cacheinfo: Use of_cpu_device_node_get instead cpu_dev->of_node Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 03/21] cacheinfo: Add helper to access any cache index for a given CPU Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 04/21] cacheinfo: Move cache_leaves_are_shared out of CONFIG_OF Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 05/21] cacheinfo: Add support to check if last level cache(LLC) is valid or shared Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 06/21] cacheinfo: Allow early detection and population of cache attributes Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 07/21] cacheinfo: Use cache identifiers to check if the caches are shared if available Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 08/21] cacheinfo: Align checks in cache_shared_cpu_map_{setup,remove} for readability Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 09/21] arch_topology: Add support to parse and detect cache attributes Sudeep Holla
2022-07-19 14:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-19 14:37 ` Conor Dooley
2022-07-19 15:05 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 10/21] arch_topology: Use the last level cache information from the cacheinfo Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 11/21] arm64: topology: Remove redundant setting of llc_id in CPU topology Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 12/21] arch_topology: Drop LLC identifier stash from the " Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 13/21] arch_topology: Set thread sibling cpumask only within the cluster Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 14/21] arch_topology: Check for non-negative value rather than -1 for IDs validity Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:15 ` [PATCH v6 15/21] arch_topology: Avoid parsing through all the CPUs once a outlier CPU is found Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:16 ` [PATCH v6 16/21] arch_topology: Don't set cluster identifier as physical package identifier Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:16 ` [PATCH v6 17/21] arch_topology: Limit span of cpu_clustergroup_mask() Sudeep Holla
2022-07-08 0:10 ` Darren Hart
2022-07-08 8:04 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-08 16:27 ` Darren Hart
2022-07-08 9:05 ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-07-08 16:14 ` Darren Hart
2022-07-04 10:16 ` [PATCH v6 18/21] arch_topology: Set cluster identifier in each core/thread from /cpu-map Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:16 ` [PATCH v6 19/21] arch_topology: Add support for parsing sockets in /cpu-map Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:16 ` [PATCH v6 20/21] arch_topology: Warn that topology for nested clusters is not supported Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 10:16 ` [PATCH v6 21/21] ACPI: Remove the unused find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology() Sudeep Holla
2022-07-04 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 00/21] arch_topology: Updates to add socket support and fix cluster ids Conor.Dooley
2022-07-04 15:20 ` Sudeep Holla
[not found] ` <507c6b64-fc23-3eea-e4c1-4d426025d658@inria.fr>
2022-07-05 19:06 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-05 20:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-05 20:14 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-05 20:22 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220719150513.a525arh663qlhkob@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mail@conchuod.ie \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=wangqing@vivo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox