From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Oza Pawandeep <quic_poza@quicinc.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
lenb@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpuidle, ACPI: Evaluate LPI arch_flags for broadcast timer
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 11:51:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230830105134.dskqqq55npsclibq@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230829201101.3330337-1-quic_poza@quicinc.com>
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 01:11:01PM -0700, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> Arm® Functional Fixed Hardware Specification defines LPI states,
> which provide an architectural context loss flags field that can
> be used to describe the context that might be lost when an LPI
> state is entered.
>
> - Core context Lost
> - General purpose registers.
> - Floating point and SIMD registers.
> - System registers, include the System register based
> - generic timer for the core.
> - Debug register in the core power domain.
> - PMU registers in the core power domain.
> - Trace register in the core power domain.
> - Trace context loss
> - GICR
> - GICD
>
> Qualcomm's custom CPUs preserves the architectural state,
> including keeping the power domain for local timers active.
> when core is power gated, the local timers are sufficient to
> wake the core up without needing broadcast timer.
>
> The patch fixes the evaluation of cpuidle arch_flags, and moves only to
> broadcast timer if core context lost is defined in ACPI LPI.
>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <quic_poza@quicinc.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> index bd68e1b7f29f..0d455b02971e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #ifndef _ASM_ACPI_H
> #define _ASM_ACPI_H
>
> +#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> #include <linux/efi.h>
> #include <linux/memblock.h>
> #include <linux/psci.h>
> @@ -42,6 +43,26 @@
> #define ACPI_MADT_GICC_SPE (offsetof(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt, \
> spe_interrupt) + sizeof(u16))
>
> +/*
> + * Arm® Functional Fixed Hardware Specification Version 1.2.
> + * Table 2: Arm Architecture context loss flags
> + */
> +#define CPUIDLE_CORE_CTXT BIT(0) /* Core context Lost */
> +
> +#ifndef arch_update_idle_state_flags
> +static __always_inline void _arch_update_idle_state_flags(u32 arch_flags,
> + unsigned int *sflags)
> +{
> + if (arch_flags & CPUIDLE_CORE_CTXT)
> + *sflags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP;
> +}
> +#define arch_update_idle_state_flags _arch_update_idle_state_flags
> +#endif
> +
> +#define CPUIDLE_TRACE_CTXT BIT(1) /* Trace context loss */
> +#define CPUIDLE_GICR_CTXT BIT(2) /* GICR */
> +#define CPUIDLE_GICD_CTXT BIT(3) /* GICD */
> +
> /* Basic configuration for ACPI */
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> pgprot_t __acpi_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr);
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> index 9718d07cc2a2..420baec3465c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -1221,8 +1221,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_setup_lpi_states(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> strscpy(state->desc, lpi->desc, CPUIDLE_DESC_LEN);
> state->exit_latency = lpi->wake_latency;
> state->target_residency = lpi->min_residency;
> - if (lpi->arch_flags)
> - state->flags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP;
> + arch_update_idle_state_flags(lpi->arch_flags, &state->flags);
> if (i != 0 && lpi->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_FFH)
> state->flags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_RCU_IDLE;
> state->enter = acpi_idle_lpi_enter;
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index d584f94409e1..d49488fdbc49 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -1471,6 +1471,10 @@ static inline int lpit_read_residency_count_address(u64 *address)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef arch_update_idle_state_flags
> +#define arch_update_idle_state_flags do {} while (0);
I think I suggested it in v2 as without that you will get the warnings the
kernel build bot has posted now.
#define arch_update_idle_state_flags(af, sf) do {} while (0)
Add the parameters and drop the leading ';'.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-30 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-29 20:11 [PATCH v3] cpuidle, ACPI: Evaluate LPI arch_flags for broadcast timer Oza Pawandeep
2023-08-29 23:54 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-30 10:51 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2023-08-30 14:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-08-30 14:49 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230830105134.dskqqq55npsclibq@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_poza@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox