* [PATCH] arm64: remove unneeded BUILD_BUG_ON assertion
@ 2024-02-02 4:02 Dawei Li
2024-02-05 12:06 ` Mark Rutland
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dawei Li @ 2024-02-02 4:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: catalin.marinas, will
Cc: mark.rutland, mcgrof, jpoimboe, j.granados, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel, set_pte_at, Dawei Li
Since commit c02433dd6de3 ("arm64: split thread_info from task stack"),
CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is enabled unconditionally for arm64. So
remove this always-true assertion from arch_dup_task_struct.
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 7387b68c745b..4ae31b7af6c3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -290,9 +290,6 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src)
fpsimd_preserve_current_state();
*dst = *src;
- /* We rely on the above assignment to initialize dst's thread_flags: */
- BUILD_BUG_ON(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK));
-
/*
* Detach src's sve_state (if any) from dst so that it does not
* get erroneously used or freed prematurely. dst's copies
--
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove unneeded BUILD_BUG_ON assertion 2024-02-02 4:02 [PATCH] arm64: remove unneeded BUILD_BUG_ON assertion Dawei Li @ 2024-02-05 12:06 ` Mark Rutland 2024-02-06 1:39 ` Dawei Li 2024-02-22 9:27 ` Dawei Li 2024-02-22 22:05 ` Catalin Marinas 2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Mark Rutland @ 2024-02-05 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dawei Li Cc: catalin.marinas, will, mcgrof, jpoimboe, j.granados, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, set_pte_at On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:02:11PM +0800, Dawei Li wrote: > Since commit c02433dd6de3 ("arm64: split thread_info from task stack"), > CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is enabled unconditionally for arm64. So > remove this always-true assertion from arch_dup_task_struct. > > Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn> > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > index 7387b68c745b..4ae31b7af6c3 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > @@ -290,9 +290,6 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src) > fpsimd_preserve_current_state(); > *dst = *src; > > - /* We rely on the above assignment to initialize dst's thread_flags: */ > - BUILD_BUG_ON(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK)); > - Does the above cause any problem today, or is this patch just a cleanup? For the benefit of other reviewers, the assertion and comment were added in commit: 4585fc59c0e8 ("arm64/sve: Fix wrong free for task->thread.sve_state") ... back in 2019, 3 years after commit: c02433dd6de3 ("arm64: split thread_info from task stack") The comment and assertion were a safety-net for backports, since commit 4585fc59c0e8 was a fix which dependend upon the thread_info being contained within task_struct, and couldn't be backported to kernels without CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK. I'm sure that we currently have plenty of other code with a similar (but undocumented) dependency. Given we've unconditionally selected CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK since v4.10, and the oldest longterm stable kernel is v4.19 (with v4.14 having EOL'd last month), I think it makes sense to delete the assertion and comment. So FWIW: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Mark. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove unneeded BUILD_BUG_ON assertion 2024-02-05 12:06 ` Mark Rutland @ 2024-02-06 1:39 ` Dawei Li 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Dawei Li @ 2024-02-06 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Rutland Cc: catalin.marinas, will, mcgrof, jpoimboe, j.granados, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, set_pte_at Hi Mark, Thanks for reviewing. On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 12:06:18PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:02:11PM +0800, Dawei Li wrote: > > Since commit c02433dd6de3 ("arm64: split thread_info from task stack"), > > CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is enabled unconditionally for arm64. So > > remove this always-true assertion from arch_dup_task_struct. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn> > > --- > > arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 3 --- > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > > index 7387b68c745b..4ae31b7af6c3 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > > @@ -290,9 +290,6 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src) > > fpsimd_preserve_current_state(); > > *dst = *src; > > > > - /* We rely on the above assignment to initialize dst's thread_flags: */ > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK)); > > - > > Does the above cause any problem today, or is this patch just a cleanup? It's just a cleanup patch. > > For the benefit of other reviewers, the assertion and comment were added in > commit: > > 4585fc59c0e8 ("arm64/sve: Fix wrong free for task->thread.sve_state") > > .. back in 2019, 3 years after commit: > > c02433dd6de3 ("arm64: split thread_info from task stack") > > The comment and assertion were a safety-net for backports, since commit > 4585fc59c0e8 was a fix which dependend upon the thread_info being contained > within task_struct, and couldn't be backported to kernels without > CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK. Thanks for the update! It helps. > > I'm sure that we currently have plenty of other code with a similar (but > undocumented) dependency. Given we've unconditionally selected Totally agreed. > CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK since v4.10, and the oldest longterm stable kernel > is v4.19 (with v4.14 having EOL'd last month), I think it makes sense to delete > the assertion and comment. > > So FWIW: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > > Mark. > Thanks, Dawei _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove unneeded BUILD_BUG_ON assertion 2024-02-02 4:02 [PATCH] arm64: remove unneeded BUILD_BUG_ON assertion Dawei Li 2024-02-05 12:06 ` Mark Rutland @ 2024-02-22 9:27 ` Dawei Li 2024-02-22 22:05 ` Catalin Marinas 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Dawei Li @ 2024-02-22 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: catalin.marinas, will Cc: mark.rutland, mcgrof, jpoimboe, j.granados, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, set_pte_at Hi, On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:02:11PM +0800, Dawei Li wrote: > Since commit c02433dd6de3 ("arm64: split thread_info from task stack"), > CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is enabled unconditionally for arm64. So > remove this always-true assertion from arch_dup_task_struct. > > Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn> Just a gentle remainder:). Thanks, Dawei > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > index 7387b68c745b..4ae31b7af6c3 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > @@ -290,9 +290,6 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src) > fpsimd_preserve_current_state(); > *dst = *src; > > - /* We rely on the above assignment to initialize dst's thread_flags: */ > - BUILD_BUG_ON(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK)); > - > /* > * Detach src's sve_state (if any) from dst so that it does not > * get erroneously used or freed prematurely. dst's copies > -- > 2.27.0 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove unneeded BUILD_BUG_ON assertion 2024-02-02 4:02 [PATCH] arm64: remove unneeded BUILD_BUG_ON assertion Dawei Li 2024-02-05 12:06 ` Mark Rutland 2024-02-22 9:27 ` Dawei Li @ 2024-02-22 22:05 ` Catalin Marinas 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Catalin Marinas @ 2024-02-22 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: will, Dawei Li Cc: mark.rutland, mcgrof, jpoimboe, j.granados, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, set_pte_at On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 12:02:11 +0800, Dawei Li wrote: > Since commit c02433dd6de3 ("arm64: split thread_info from task stack"), > CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is enabled unconditionally for arm64. So > remove this always-true assertion from arch_dup_task_struct. > > Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks! [1/1] arm64: remove unneeded BUILD_BUG_ON assertion https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/bce79b0c8097 -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-22 22:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-02-02 4:02 [PATCH] arm64: remove unneeded BUILD_BUG_ON assertion Dawei Li 2024-02-05 12:06 ` Mark Rutland 2024-02-06 1:39 ` Dawei Li 2024-02-22 9:27 ` Dawei Li 2024-02-22 22:05 ` Catalin Marinas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox