* [PATCH v2 1/1] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature
@ 2024-07-12 14:18 Frank Li
2024-07-12 14:30 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-07-12 15:03 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Frank Li @ 2024-07-12 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux
Cc: Frank.li, alice.guo, festevam, imx, kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel, linux-watchdog, s.hauer, shawnguo, wim, ye.li
Move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature to simple code logic for
difference compatible string.
i.MX93 watchdog needn't wait 2.5 clocks after RCS is done. So needn't set
post_rcs_wait.
Signed-off-by: Alice Guo <alice.guo@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Ye Li <ye.li@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
---
Change from v1 to v2
- Combine to one patch
---
drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c
index 94914a22daff7..3a75a6f98f8f0 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(nowayout, "Watchdog cannot be stopped once started (default="
struct imx_wdt_hw_feature {
bool prescaler_enable;
+ bool post_rcs_wait;
u32 wdog_clock_rate;
};
@@ -62,7 +63,6 @@ struct imx7ulp_wdt_device {
struct watchdog_device wdd;
void __iomem *base;
struct clk *clk;
- bool post_rcs_wait;
bool ext_reset;
const struct imx_wdt_hw_feature *hw;
};
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int imx7ulp_wdt_wait_rcs(struct imx7ulp_wdt_device *wdt)
ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
/* Wait 2.5 clocks after RCS done */
- if (wdt->post_rcs_wait)
+ if (wdt->hw->post_rcs_wait)
usleep_range(wait_min, wait_min + 2000);
return ret;
@@ -334,15 +334,6 @@ static int imx7ulp_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* The WDOG may need to do external reset through dedicated pin */
imx7ulp_wdt->ext_reset = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "fsl,ext-reset-output");
- imx7ulp_wdt->post_rcs_wait = true;
- if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node,
- "fsl,imx8ulp-wdt")) {
- dev_info(dev, "imx8ulp wdt probe\n");
- imx7ulp_wdt->post_rcs_wait = false;
- } else {
- dev_info(dev, "imx7ulp wdt probe\n");
- }
-
wdog = &imx7ulp_wdt->wdd;
wdog->info = &imx7ulp_wdt_info;
wdog->ops = &imx7ulp_wdt_ops;
@@ -403,6 +394,12 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops imx7ulp_wdt_pm_ops = {
static const struct imx_wdt_hw_feature imx7ulp_wdt_hw = {
.prescaler_enable = false,
.wdog_clock_rate = 1000,
+ .post_rcs_wait = true,
+};
+
+static const struct imx_wdt_hw_feature imx8ulp_wdt_hw = {
+ .prescaler_enable = false,
+ .wdog_clock_rate = 1000,
};
static const struct imx_wdt_hw_feature imx93_wdt_hw = {
@@ -411,7 +408,7 @@ static const struct imx_wdt_hw_feature imx93_wdt_hw = {
};
static const struct of_device_id imx7ulp_wdt_dt_ids[] = {
- { .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-wdt", .data = &imx7ulp_wdt_hw, },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-wdt", .data = &imx8ulp_wdt_hw, },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-wdt", .data = &imx7ulp_wdt_hw, },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx93-wdt", .data = &imx93_wdt_hw, },
{ /* sentinel */ }
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature
2024-07-12 14:18 [PATCH v2 1/1] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature Frank Li
@ 2024-07-12 14:30 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-07-12 14:38 ` Frank Li
2024-07-12 15:03 ` Guenter Roeck
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2024-07-12 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Li
Cc: linux, alice.guo, imx, kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
linux-watchdog, s.hauer, shawnguo, wim, ye.li
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 11:19 AM Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> Move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature to simple code logic for
> difference compatible string.
>
> i.MX93 watchdog needn't wait 2.5 clocks after RCS is done. So needn't set
s/needn't/does not need
You mention i.MX93 here, but the code touches i.MX8ULP. Is that correct?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature
2024-07-12 14:30 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2024-07-12 14:38 ` Frank Li
2024-07-12 14:54 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Frank Li @ 2024-07-12 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Estevam
Cc: linux, alice.guo, imx, kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
linux-watchdog, s.hauer, shawnguo, wim, ye.li
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 11:30:14AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 11:19 AM Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > Move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature to simple code logic for
> > difference compatible string.
> >
> > i.MX93 watchdog needn't wait 2.5 clocks after RCS is done. So needn't set
>
> s/needn't/does not need
>
> You mention i.MX93 here, but the code touches i.MX8ULP. Is that correct?
Yes, default is disabled.
Please ref v1
https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20240711-wdt-v1-0-8955a9e05ba0@nxp.com/T/#t
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature
2024-07-12 14:38 ` Frank Li
@ 2024-07-12 14:54 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2024-07-12 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Li
Cc: linux, alice.guo, imx, kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
linux-watchdog, s.hauer, shawnguo, wim, ye.li
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 11:38 AM Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com> wrote:
> Yes, default is disabled.
>
> Please ref v1
> https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20240711-wdt-v1-0-8955a9e05ba0@nxp.com/T/#t
I understand that.
My point is about the commit log: you mention i.MX93, but you change
i.MX8ULP. This is confusing.
Also, better to explicitly pass .prescaler_enable = false inside
imx93_wdt_hw for consistency.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature
2024-07-12 14:18 [PATCH v2 1/1] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature Frank Li
2024-07-12 14:30 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2024-07-12 15:03 ` Guenter Roeck
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2024-07-12 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Li
Cc: alice.guo, festevam, imx, kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
linux-watchdog, s.hauer, shawnguo, wim, ye.li
On 7/12/24 07:18, Frank Li wrote:
> Move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature to simple code logic for
> difference compatible string.
>
> i.MX93 watchdog needn't wait 2.5 clocks after RCS is done. So needn't set
> post_rcs_wait.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Guo <alice.guo@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ye Li <ye.li@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-12 15:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-07-12 14:18 [PATCH v2 1/1] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature Frank Li
2024-07-12 14:30 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-07-12 14:38 ` Frank Li
2024-07-12 14:54 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-07-12 15:03 ` Guenter Roeck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox