Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ti-cpufreq: AM62: Backward compatibility for syscon and update offsets
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 13:27:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241001075759.o2a6vhjia5sl6vhr@lcpd911> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240930-b4-ti-cpufreq-am62-quirk-v1-0-b5e04f0f899b@ti.com>

On Sep 30, 2024 at 15:02:08 +0530, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> With the Silicon revision being taken directly from socinfo, there's no
> longer any need for reading any SOC register for revision from this driver.
> Hence, we do not require any rev_offset for AM62 family of devices.
> 
> Also, maintain the backward compatibility with old devicetree, and hence
> add condition to handle the case where we have the zero offset such that we
> don't end up reading the wrong register offset in new AM625 DTs whenever we fix
> them up.
> 
> These patches have been in discussion as part of another series, which is now
> being split up as per discussions with Nishanth. Ref. the following link for
> more context on the same:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240926-ti-cpufreq-fixes-v5-v7-0-3c94c398fe8f@ti.com/
> 
> **DEPENDS ON:**
> "mfd: syscon: Use regmap max_register_is_0 as needed"
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240903184710.1552067-1-nm@ti.com/

Just an update, the above dependency patch is now taken in by Lee Jones [1].
Waiting for it to finally appear in -next.

+ Lee just because we are users of that patch.

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/172770742318.523866.16912261914335612487.b4-ty@kernel.org/


-- 
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole
Texas Instruments Incorporated


       reply	other threads:[~2024-10-01  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240930-b4-ti-cpufreq-am62-quirk-v1-0-b5e04f0f899b@ti.com>
2024-10-01  7:57 ` Dhruva Gole [this message]
2024-10-01  8:04   ` [PATCH 0/2] ti-cpufreq: AM62: Backward compatibility for syscon and update offsets Viresh Kumar
2024-10-03  9:13     ` Dhruva Gole

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241001075759.o2a6vhjia5sl6vhr@lcpd911 \
    --to=d-gole@ti.com \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=bb@ti.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox