Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: arm_cspmu: nvidia: update CNVLINK PMU events

[Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 09:58:45PM +0000, Besar Wicaksono wrote:
> Rename loc* and rem* events in CNVLINK PMU to cmem* and gmem* events.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/nvidia_cspmu.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/nvidia_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/nvidia_cspmu.c
> index ea2d44adfa7c..d1cd9975e71a 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/nvidia_cspmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/nvidia_cspmu.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,25 @@ static struct attribute *mcf_pmu_event_attrs[] = {
>  	NULL,
>  };
>  
> +static struct attribute *mcf_cnvlink_pmu_event_attrs[] = {
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_bytes_cmem,			0x0),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_bytes_gmem,			0x1),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_bytes_cmem,			0x2),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_bytes_gmem,			0x3),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(total_bytes_cmem,			0x4),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(total_bytes_gmem,			0x5),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_req_cmem,			0x6),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_req_gmem,			0x7),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_req_cmem,			0x8),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_req_gmem,			0x9),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(total_req_cmem,			0xa),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(total_req_gmem,			0xb),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_cum_outs_cmem,			0xc),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_cum_outs_gmem,			0xd),
> +	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(cycles, ARM_CSPMU_EVT_CYCLES_DEFAULT),
> +	NULL,
> +};
> +
>  static struct attribute *generic_pmu_event_attrs[] = {
>  	ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(cycles, ARM_CSPMU_EVT_CYCLES_DEFAULT),
>  	NULL,
> @@ -234,7 +253,7 @@ static const struct nv_cspmu_match nv_cspmu_match[] = {
>  	  .filter_default_val = NV_CNVL_FILTER_ID_MASK,
>  	  .name_pattern = "nvidia_cnvlink_pmu_%u",
>  	  .name_fmt = NAME_FMT_SOCKET,
> -	  .event_attr = mcf_pmu_event_attrs,
> +	  .event_attr = mcf_cnvlink_pmu_event_attrs,
>  	  .format_attr = cnvlink_pmu_format_attrs
>  	},

Hmm. Isn't this a user-visible change? For example, will scripts driving
'perf' with the old event names continue to work after this patch?

Will