public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
	<pierre-henry.moussay@microchip.com>,
	<valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/11] clk: move meson clk-regmap implementation to common code
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:36:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241128-monstrous-embargo-a665d921410d@wendy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <430bde3b35382e640843e32a9f351326.sboyd@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2250 bytes --]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 05:29:54PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Conor Dooley (2024-11-06 04:56:25)
> > My use case doesn't
> > actually need the registration code changes either as, currently, only reg
> > gets set at runtime, but leaving that out is a level of incomplete I'd not
> > let myself away with.
> > Obviously shoving the extra members into the clk structs has the downside
> > of taking up a pointer and a offset worth of memory for each clock of
> > that type registered, but it is substantially easier to support devices
> > with multiple regmaps that way. Probably moot though since the approach you
> > suggested in the thread linked above that implements a clk_hw_get_regmap()
> > has to store a pointer to the regmap's identifier which would take up an
> > identical amount of memory.
> 
> We don't need to store the regmap identifier in the struct clk. We can
> store it in the 'struct clk_init_data' with some new field, and only do
> that when/if we actually need to. We would need to pass the init data to
> the clk_ops::init() callback though. We currently knock that out during
> registration so that clk_hw->init is NULL. Probably we can just set that
> to NULL after the init routine runs in __clk_core_init().
> 
> Long story short, don't add something to 'struct clk_core', 'struct
> clk', or 'struct clk_hw' for these details. We can have a 'struct
> clk_regmap_hw' that everyone else can build upon:
> 
>   struct clk_regmap_hw {
>         struct regmap *regmap;
>         struct clk_hw hw;
>   };

What's the point of this? I don't understand why you want to do this over
what clk_divider et al already do, where clk_hw and the iomem pointer
are in the struct itself.

> 
> and then set the regmap pointer during registration in
> clk_hw_init_regmap().
> 
> int clk_hw_init_regmap(struct clk_hw *hw)
> {
> 	struct device *dev;
> 	struct regmap *regmap;
> 	struct clk_regmap_hw *rhw;
> 
> 	rhw = clk_hw_to_clk_regmap_hw(hw);
> 
> 	dev = clk_hw_get_dev(hw);
> 	if (!dev)
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 
> 	regmap = dev_get_regmap(dev, hw->init->regmap_name);
> 	if (!regmap)
> 		return -EINVAL; // Print helpful message
> 	rhw->regmap = regmap;
> 
> 	return 0;
> }

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-28 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-02 10:47 [PATCH v1 00/11] Redo PolarFire SoC's mailbox/clock devicestrees and related code Conor Dooley
2024-10-02 10:47 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] dt-bindings: mailbox: mpfs: fix reg properties Conor Dooley
2024-10-02 23:13   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-10-02 10:48 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] mailbox: mpfs: support new, syscon based, devicetree configuration Conor Dooley
2024-10-02 10:48 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon document the non simple-mfd syscon on PolarFire SoC Conor Dooley
2024-10-02 23:28   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-10-09 16:12   ` (subset) " Lee Jones
2024-10-02 10:48 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] dt-bindings: soc: microchip: document the two simple-mfd syscons " Conor Dooley
2024-10-02 23:28   ` Rob Herring
2024-10-02 10:48 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] soc: microchip: add mfd drivers for two syscon regions " Conor Dooley
2024-10-02 10:48 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] reset: mpfs: add non-auxiliary bus probing Conor Dooley
2024-10-02 11:59   ` Philipp Zabel
2024-10-02 10:48 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] dt-bindings: clk: microchip: mpfs: remove first reg region Conor Dooley
2024-10-02 23:36   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-10-02 10:48 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] clk: move meson clk-regmap implementation to common code Conor Dooley
2024-10-02 11:20   ` Neil Armstrong
2024-10-02 13:21     ` Jerome Brunet
2024-10-03 11:33       ` Conor Dooley
2024-11-06 12:56         ` Conor Dooley
2024-11-15  1:29           ` Stephen Boyd
2024-11-28 10:36             ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2024-12-03 22:50               ` Stephen Boyd
2024-12-06 13:56                 ` Conor Dooley
2025-01-21 17:38                   ` Conor Dooley
2025-02-20 15:29                     ` Conor Dooley
2024-10-02 10:48 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] clk: microchip: mpfs: use regmap clock types Conor Dooley
2024-10-02 10:48 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] riscv: dts: microchip: fix mailbox description Conor Dooley
2024-10-14 15:41   ` Conor Dooley
2024-10-02 10:48 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] riscv: dts: microchip: convert clock and reset to use syscon Conor Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241128-monstrous-embargo-a665d921410d@wendy \
    --to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pierre-henry.moussay@microchip.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox