Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
	yeoreum.yun@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, robh@kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>,
	Graham Woodward <graham.woodward@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf: arm_spe: Add format option for discard mode
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 17:39:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107173950.GA8111@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241224104414.179365-2-james.clark@linaro.org>

On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 10:44:08AM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> FEAT_SPEv1p2 (optional from Armv8.6) adds a discard mode that allows all
> SPE data to be discarded rather than written to memory. Add a format
> bit for this mode.
> 
> If the mode isn't supported, the format bit isn't published and attempts
> to use it will result in -EOPNOTSUPP. Allocating an aux buffer is still
> allowed even though it won't be written to so that old tools continue to
> work, but updated tools can choose to skip this step.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> index fd5b78732603..9aaf3f98e6f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,9 @@ static const struct attribute_group arm_spe_pmu_cap_group = {
>  #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_store_filter_CFG		config	/* PMSFCR_EL1.ST */
>  #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_store_filter_LO		34
>  #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_store_filter_HI		34
> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_discard_CFG		config	/* PMBLIMITR_EL1.FM = DISCARD */
> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_discard_LO			35
> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_discard_HI			35
>  
>  #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_event_filter_CFG		config1	/* PMSEVFR_EL1 */
>  #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_event_filter_LO		0
> @@ -216,6 +219,7 @@ GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(store_filter);
>  GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event_filter);
>  GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(inv_event_filter);
>  GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(min_latency);
> +GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(discard);
>  
>  static struct attribute *arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr[] = {
>  	&format_attr_ts_enable.attr,
> @@ -228,9 +232,15 @@ static struct attribute *arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr[] = {
>  	&format_attr_event_filter.attr,
>  	&format_attr_inv_event_filter.attr,
>  	&format_attr_min_latency.attr,
> +	&format_attr_discard.attr,
>  	NULL,
>  };
>  
> +static bool discard_unsupported(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
> +{
> +	return spe_pmu->pmsver < ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_V1P2;
> +}

Why not add a new SPE_PMU_FEAT_* for this and handle it in a similar
way to other optional hardware features?

Will


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-07 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-24 10:44 [PATCH v2 0/5] perf: arm_spe: Add format option for discard mode James Clark
2024-12-24 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] " James Clark
2025-01-07 17:39   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-01-08 10:08     ` James Clark
2024-12-24 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] perf tool: arm-spe: Pull out functions for aux buffer and tracking setup James Clark
2024-12-24 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] perf tool: arm-spe: Don't allocate buffer or tracking event in discard mode James Clark
2024-12-24 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] perf test: arm_spe: Add test for " James Clark
2024-12-24 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] perf docs: arm_spe: Document new " James Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250107173950.GA8111@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=graham.woodward@arm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox