From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
yeoreum.yun@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, robh@kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>,
Graham Woodward <graham.woodward@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf: arm_spe: Add format option for discard mode
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:08:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ccab556d-5d08-49f9-8039-a8c507a7a0e1@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107173950.GA8111@willie-the-truck>
On 07/01/2025 5:39 pm, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 10:44:08AM +0000, James Clark wrote:
>> FEAT_SPEv1p2 (optional from Armv8.6) adds a discard mode that allows all
>> SPE data to be discarded rather than written to memory. Add a format
>> bit for this mode.
>>
>> If the mode isn't supported, the format bit isn't published and attempts
>> to use it will result in -EOPNOTSUPP. Allocating an aux buffer is still
>> allowed even though it won't be written to so that old tools continue to
>> work, but updated tools can choose to skip this step.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
>> index fd5b78732603..9aaf3f98e6f5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
>> @@ -193,6 +193,9 @@ static const struct attribute_group arm_spe_pmu_cap_group = {
>> #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_store_filter_CFG config /* PMSFCR_EL1.ST */
>> #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_store_filter_LO 34
>> #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_store_filter_HI 34
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_discard_CFG config /* PMBLIMITR_EL1.FM = DISCARD */
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_discard_LO 35
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_discard_HI 35
>>
>> #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_event_filter_CFG config1 /* PMSEVFR_EL1 */
>> #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_event_filter_LO 0
>> @@ -216,6 +219,7 @@ GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(store_filter);
>> GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event_filter);
>> GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(inv_event_filter);
>> GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(min_latency);
>> +GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(discard);
>>
>> static struct attribute *arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr[] = {
>> &format_attr_ts_enable.attr,
>> @@ -228,9 +232,15 @@ static struct attribute *arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr[] = {
>> &format_attr_event_filter.attr,
>> &format_attr_inv_event_filter.attr,
>> &format_attr_min_latency.attr,
>> + &format_attr_discard.attr,
>> NULL,
>> };
>>
>> +static bool discard_unsupported(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
>> +{
>> + return spe_pmu->pmsver < ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_V1P2;
>> +}
>
> Why not add a new SPE_PMU_FEAT_* for this and handle it in a similar
> way to other optional hardware features?
>
> Will
Hmmm good point, I'm not sure why I didn't do it that way. Possibly
because it's only based off pmsver which is already saved, whereas the
other feats are based off reading PMSIDR which is thrown away. But I can
add SPE_PMU_FEAT_DISCARD.
Thanks
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-24 10:44 [PATCH v2 0/5] perf: arm_spe: Add format option for discard mode James Clark
2024-12-24 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] " James Clark
2025-01-07 17:39 ` Will Deacon
2025-01-08 10:08 ` James Clark [this message]
2024-12-24 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] perf tool: arm-spe: Pull out functions for aux buffer and tracking setup James Clark
2024-12-24 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] perf tool: arm-spe: Don't allocate buffer or tracking event in discard mode James Clark
2024-12-24 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] perf test: arm_spe: Add test for " James Clark
2024-12-24 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] perf docs: arm_spe: Document new " James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ccab556d-5d08-49f9-8039-a8c507a7a0e1@linaro.org \
--to=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=graham.woodward@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox