From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org" <arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] firmware: imx: Add i.MX95 SCMI LMM driver
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:48:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250415-exotic-scarlet-seriema-c0e223@sudeepholla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415091016.GB10243@nxa18884-linux>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 05:10:16PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 12:17:34PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:00:20AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> >>
> >> Oops, I just checked wrong Kconfig under drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/
> >> vendors/imx
> >>
> >> Build this for ARM32 i.MX is ok, I just think no need. So add
> >> a ARM64 dependency.
> >>
> >
> >OK, I will drop the ARM64 dependency when applying. I also don't understand
>
> Thanks for helping on this.
>
> >the dependency on i.MX firmware LMM and CPU drivers in the scmi vendor
> >protocol as the dependency should be other way around. But I see Arnd had
> >fixed it so I will keep it as you have posted to keep them all aligned.
> Not dig into much on this.
> I just followed what Arnd did when I prepared the patchset to avoid
> potential build issue as reported before.
>
Yes, I am keeping it based on those changes. I need to spend sometime to
understand why it was done so and see if anything can be improved. It is
not straightforward to understand that dependency, for me looks like it
is in reverse direction.
Anyway I have pushed it tentatively, will let you know once it is finalised.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 8:44 [PATCH v4 0/7] firmware: scmi/imx: Add i.MX95 LMM/CPU Protocol Peng Fan (OSS)
2025-04-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] firmware: arm_scmi: imx: Add LMM and CPU documentation Peng Fan (OSS)
2025-04-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] dt-bindings: firmware: Add i.MX95 SCMI LMM and CPU protocol Peng Fan (OSS)
2025-04-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] firmware: arm_scmi: imx: Add i.MX95 LMM protocol Peng Fan (OSS)
2025-04-08 9:17 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-04-09 3:37 ` Peng Fan
2025-04-08 9:21 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-04-09 3:33 ` Peng Fan
2025-04-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] firmware: arm_scmi: imx: Add i.MX95 CPU Protocol Peng Fan (OSS)
2025-04-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] firmware: imx: Add i.MX95 SCMI LMM driver Peng Fan (OSS)
2025-04-14 9:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-04-14 9:57 ` Peng Fan
2025-04-14 10:15 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-04-14 10:44 ` Peng Fan
2025-04-14 11:00 ` Peng Fan
2025-04-14 11:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-04-15 9:10 ` Peng Fan
2025-04-15 14:48 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2025-04-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] firmware: imx: Add i.MX95 SCMI CPU driver Peng Fan (OSS)
2025-04-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] MAINTAINERS: add entry for i.MX SCMI extensions Peng Fan (OSS)
2025-04-24 9:43 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] firmware: scmi/imx: Add i.MX95 LMM/CPU Protocol Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250415-exotic-scarlet-seriema-c0e223@sudeepholla \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox