From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: broonie@kernel.org,catalin.marinas@arm.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,james.morse@arm.com,kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,mark.rutland@arm.com,maz@kernel.org,oleg@redhat.com,oliver.upton@linux.dev,suzuki.poulose@arm.com,will@kernel.org
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "arm64/fpsimd: Stop using TIF_SVE to manage register saving in KVM" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:43:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025042253-follicle-credibly-3c4b@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250404-stable-sve-6-1-v1-4-cd5c9eb52d49@kernel.org>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64/fpsimd: Stop using TIF_SVE to manage register saving in KVM
to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arm64-fpsimd-stop-using-tif_sve-to-manage-register-saving-in-kvm.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From stable+bounces-128303-greg=kroah.com@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 4 15:28:32 2025
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:23:37 +0100
Subject: arm64/fpsimd: Stop using TIF_SVE to manage register saving in KVM
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, stable@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Message-ID: <20250404-stable-sve-6-1-v1-4-cd5c9eb52d49@kernel.org>
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 62021cc36add7b2c015b837f7893f2fb4b8c2586 ]
Now that we are explicitly telling the host FP code which register state
it needs to save we can remove the manipulation of TIF_SVE from the KVM
code, simplifying it and allowing us to optimise our handling of normal
tasks. Remove the manipulation of TIF_SVE from KVM and instead rely on
to_save to ensure we save the correct data for it.
There should be no functional or performance impact from this change.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115094640.112848-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
[ Mark: trivial backport ]
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 22 ++++------------------
arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c | 3 ---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -439,8 +439,8 @@ static void task_fpsimd_load(void)
* last, if KVM is involved this may be the guest VM context rather
* than the host thread for the VM pointed to by current. This means
* that we must always reference the state storage via last rather
- * than via current, other than the TIF_ flags which KVM will
- * carefully maintain for us.
+ * than via current, if we are saving KVM state then it will have
+ * ensured that the type of registers to save is set in last->to_save.
*/
static void fpsimd_save(void)
{
@@ -457,27 +457,13 @@ static void fpsimd_save(void)
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE))
return;
- if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SVE)) {
+ if ((last->to_save == FP_STATE_CURRENT && test_thread_flag(TIF_SVE)) ||
+ last->to_save == FP_STATE_SVE) {
save_sve_regs = true;
save_ffr = true;
vl = last->sve_vl;
}
- /*
- * Validate that an explicitly specified state to save is
- * consistent with the task state.
- */
- switch (last->to_save) {
- case FP_STATE_CURRENT:
- break;
- case FP_STATE_FPSIMD:
- WARN_ON_ONCE(save_sve_regs);
- break;
- case FP_STATE_SVE:
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!save_sve_regs);
- break;
- }
-
if (system_supports_sme()) {
u64 *svcr = last->svcr;
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
@@ -151,7 +151,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxsync_fp(struct kvm
&vcpu->arch.fp_type, fp_type);
clear_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
- update_thread_flag(TIF_SVE, vcpu_has_sve(vcpu));
}
}
@@ -208,7 +207,5 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(struct kvm_vcp
sysreg_clear_set(CPACR_EL1, CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN, 0);
}
- update_thread_flag(TIF_SVE, 0);
-
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from broonie@kernel.org are
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-remove-host-fpsimd-saving-for-non-protected-kvm.patch
queue-6.1/spi-cadence-qspi-fix-probe-on-am62a-lp-sk.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-qdsp6-q6asm-dai-fix-q6asm_dai_compr_set_params-error-path.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-qdsp6-q6apm-dai-fix-capture-pipeline-overruns.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-mark-some-header-functions-as-inline.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-eagerly-switch-zcr_el-1-2.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-unconditionally-save-flush-host-fpsimd-sve-sme-state.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-amd-add-dmi-quirk-for-acp6x-mic-support.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-refactor-exit-handlers.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-qdsp6-q6apm-dai-set-10-ms-period-and-buffer-alignment.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-codecs-lpass-wsa-macro-fix-vi-feedback-rate.patch
queue-6.1/arm64-fpsimd-track-the-saved-fpsimd-state-type-separately-to-tif_sve.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-remove-vhe-host-restore-of-cpacr_el1.zen.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-remove-vhe-host-restore-of-cpacr_el1.smen.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-fsl_audmix-register-card-device-depends-on-dais.patch
queue-6.1/arm64-fpsimd-have-kvm-explicitly-say-which-fp-registers-to-save.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-discard-any-sve-state-when-entering-kvm-guests.patch
queue-6.1/arm64-fpsimd-stop-using-tif_sve-to-manage-register-saving-in-kvm.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-codecs-lpass-wsa-macro-fix-logic-of-enabling-vi-channels.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-calculate-cptr_el2-traps-on-activating-traps.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-22 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-04 13:23 [6.1 PATCH RESEND 00/12] KVM: arm64: Backport of SVE fixes to v6.1 Mark Brown
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 01/12] KVM: arm64: Discard any SVE state when entering KVM guests Mark Brown
2025-04-22 6:43 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Discard any SVE state when entering KVM guests" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 02/12] arm64/fpsimd: Track the saved FPSIMD state type separately to TIF_SVE Mark Brown
2025-04-22 6:43 ` Patch "arm64/fpsimd: Track the saved FPSIMD state type separately to TIF_SVE" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 03/12] arm64/fpsimd: Have KVM explicitly say which FP registers to save Mark Brown
2025-04-22 6:43 ` Patch "arm64/fpsimd: Have KVM explicitly say which FP registers to save" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 04/12] arm64/fpsimd: Stop using TIF_SVE to manage register saving in KVM Mark Brown
2025-04-22 6:43 ` gregkh [this message]
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 05/12] KVM: arm64: Unconditionally save+flush host FPSIMD/SVE/SME state Mark Brown
2025-04-22 6:43 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Unconditionally save+flush host FPSIMD/SVE/SME state" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 06/12] KVM: arm64: Remove host FPSIMD saving for non-protected KVM Mark Brown
2025-04-22 6:43 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove host FPSIMD saving for non-protected KVM" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 07/12] KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.ZEN Mark Brown
2025-04-22 6:43 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.ZEN" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 08/12] KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.SMEN Mark Brown
2025-04-22 6:43 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.SMEN" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 09/12] KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers Mark Brown
2025-04-22 6:43 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 10/12] KVM: arm64: Mark some header functions as inline Mark Brown
2025-04-22 6:43 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Mark some header functions as inline" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 11/12] KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps Mark Brown
2025-04-22 6:43 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 12/12] KVM: arm64: Eagerly switch ZCR_EL{1,2} Mark Brown
2025-04-22 6:43 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Eagerly switch ZCR_EL{1,2}" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025042253-follicle-credibly-3c4b@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox