Re: [PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: fix order of arguments in clock macro

[Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>]

On Thu, 1 May 2025 20:14:24 +0800
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> wrote:

Hi,

> On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:53:25 +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > When introducing the SUNXI_CCU_MP_DATA_WITH_MUX_GATE_FEAT macro, the order
> > of the last two arguments was different between the users and the
> > definition: features became flags and flags became features.
> > 
> > This just didn't end up in a desaster yet because most users ended up
> > passing 0 for both arguments, and other clocks (for the new A523 SoC) are
> > not yet used.
> > 
> > [...]  
> 
> Applied to clk-fixes-for-6.15 in git@github.com:linux-sunxi/linux-sunxi.git, thanks!

thanks for that, but the URL here is not correct, is it? Should be the
kernel.org repo instead? Saw this already in other "applied" emails.

Cheers,
Andre


> 
> [1/1] clk: sunxi-ng: fix order of arguments in clock macro
>       commit: 4a9c3c3215491f25bc66d615faa921c814b1a479
> 
> Best regards,