Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM SMMU DRIVERS"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:IOMMU SUBSYSTEM" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/40] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add quirk to quiet WARN_ON()
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 15:33:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250515143309.GA12165@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250514175527.42488-6-robdclark@gmail.com>

On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 10:53:19AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> 
> In situations where mapping/unmapping sequence can be controlled by
> userspace, attempting to map over a region that has not yet been
> unmapped is an error.  But not something that should spam dmesg.
> 
> Now that there is a quirk, we can also drop the selftest_running
> flag, and use the quirk instead for selftests.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
>  include/linux/io-pgtable.h     |  8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

[...]

> diff --git a/include/linux/io-pgtable.h b/include/linux/io-pgtable.h
> index bba2a51c87d2..639b8f4fb87d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/io-pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/io-pgtable.h
> @@ -88,6 +88,13 @@ struct io_pgtable_cfg {
>  	 *
>  	 * IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_HD: Enables dirty tracking in stage 1 pagetable.
>  	 * IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_S2FWB: Use the FWB format for the MemAttrs bits
> +	 *
> +	 * IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_WARN_ON: Do not WARN_ON() on conflicting
> +	 *	mappings, but silently return -EEXISTS.  Normally an attempt
> +	 *	to map over an existing mapping would indicate some sort of
> +	 *	kernel bug, which would justify the WARN_ON().  But for GPU
> +	 *	drivers, this could be under control of userspace.  Which
> +	 *	deserves an error return, but not to spam dmesg.
>  	 */
>  	#define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_NS			BIT(0)
>  	#define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_PERMS		BIT(1)
> @@ -97,6 +104,7 @@ struct io_pgtable_cfg {
>  	#define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_OUTER_WBWA		BIT(6)
>  	#define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_HD			BIT(7)
>  	#define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_S2FWB		BIT(8)
> +	#define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_WARN_ON		BIT(9)

This feels a bit fragile to me:
  * IOMMU-API users of io-pgtable shouldn't be passing this quirk
    but might end up doing so to paper over driver bugs.

  * Low-level users of io-pgtable who expose page-table operations to
    userspace need to pass the quirk, but might well not bother because
    well-behaved userspace doesn't trigger the warning.

So overall, it's all a bit unsatisfactory. Is there a way we could have
the warnings only when invoked via the IOMMU API?

Will


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-15 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-14 17:53 [PATCH v4 00/40] drm/msm: sparse / "VM_BIND" support Rob Clark
2025-05-14 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 05/40] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add quirk to quiet WARN_ON() Rob Clark
2025-05-15 14:33   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-05-15 14:48     ` Rob Clark
2025-05-20 11:31       ` Will Deacon
2025-05-20 13:06         ` Robin Murphy
2025-05-20 14:06           ` Will Deacon
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-14 16:58 [PATCH v4 00/40] drm/msm: sparse / "VM_BIND" support Rob Clark
2025-05-14 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 05/40] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add quirk to quiet WARN_ON() Rob Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250515143309.GA12165@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=cwabbott0@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox