From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
"moderated list:ARM SMMU DRIVERS"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:IOMMU SUBSYSTEM" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/40] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add quirk to quiet WARN_ON()
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 15:33:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250515143309.GA12165@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250514175527.42488-6-robdclark@gmail.com>
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 10:53:19AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
>
> In situations where mapping/unmapping sequence can be controlled by
> userspace, attempting to map over a region that has not yet been
> unmapped is an error. But not something that should spam dmesg.
>
> Now that there is a quirk, we can also drop the selftest_running
> flag, and use the quirk instead for selftests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> include/linux/io-pgtable.h | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/io-pgtable.h b/include/linux/io-pgtable.h
> index bba2a51c87d2..639b8f4fb87d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/io-pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/io-pgtable.h
> @@ -88,6 +88,13 @@ struct io_pgtable_cfg {
> *
> * IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_HD: Enables dirty tracking in stage 1 pagetable.
> * IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_S2FWB: Use the FWB format for the MemAttrs bits
> + *
> + * IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_WARN_ON: Do not WARN_ON() on conflicting
> + * mappings, but silently return -EEXISTS. Normally an attempt
> + * to map over an existing mapping would indicate some sort of
> + * kernel bug, which would justify the WARN_ON(). But for GPU
> + * drivers, this could be under control of userspace. Which
> + * deserves an error return, but not to spam dmesg.
> */
> #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_NS BIT(0)
> #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_PERMS BIT(1)
> @@ -97,6 +104,7 @@ struct io_pgtable_cfg {
> #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_OUTER_WBWA BIT(6)
> #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_HD BIT(7)
> #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_S2FWB BIT(8)
> + #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_WARN_ON BIT(9)
This feels a bit fragile to me:
* IOMMU-API users of io-pgtable shouldn't be passing this quirk
but might end up doing so to paper over driver bugs.
* Low-level users of io-pgtable who expose page-table operations to
userspace need to pass the quirk, but might well not bother because
well-behaved userspace doesn't trigger the warning.
So overall, it's all a bit unsatisfactory. Is there a way we could have
the warnings only when invoked via the IOMMU API?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-14 17:53 [PATCH v4 00/40] drm/msm: sparse / "VM_BIND" support Rob Clark
2025-05-14 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 05/40] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add quirk to quiet WARN_ON() Rob Clark
2025-05-15 14:33 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-05-15 14:48 ` Rob Clark
2025-05-20 11:31 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-20 13:06 ` Robin Murphy
2025-05-20 14:06 ` Will Deacon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-14 16:58 [PATCH v4 00/40] drm/msm: sparse / "VM_BIND" support Rob Clark
2025-05-14 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 05/40] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add quirk to quiet WARN_ON() Rob Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250515143309.GA12165@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=cwabbott0@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox