Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM SMMU DRIVERS"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:IOMMU SUBSYSTEM" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/40] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add quirk to quiet WARN_ON()
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 12:31:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250520113146.GA18435@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGsnOD8fZmTXAEZZNrdK-NXdUJF51s51EhYQ6Ed7dCFM0A@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 07:48:39AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 7:33 AM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 10:53:19AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> > >
> > > In situations where mapping/unmapping sequence can be controlled by
> > > userspace, attempting to map over a region that has not yet been
> > > unmapped is an error.  But not something that should spam dmesg.
> > >
> > > Now that there is a quirk, we can also drop the selftest_running
> > > flag, and use the quirk instead for selftests.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> > > Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> > >  include/linux/io-pgtable.h     |  8 ++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/io-pgtable.h b/include/linux/io-pgtable.h
> > > index bba2a51c87d2..639b8f4fb87d 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/io-pgtable.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/io-pgtable.h
> > > @@ -88,6 +88,13 @@ struct io_pgtable_cfg {
> > >        *
> > >        * IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_HD: Enables dirty tracking in stage 1 pagetable.
> > >        * IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_S2FWB: Use the FWB format for the MemAttrs bits
> > > +      *
> > > +      * IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_WARN_ON: Do not WARN_ON() on conflicting
> > > +      *      mappings, but silently return -EEXISTS.  Normally an attempt
> > > +      *      to map over an existing mapping would indicate some sort of
> > > +      *      kernel bug, which would justify the WARN_ON().  But for GPU
> > > +      *      drivers, this could be under control of userspace.  Which
> > > +      *      deserves an error return, but not to spam dmesg.
> > >        */
> > >       #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_NS                 BIT(0)
> > >       #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_PERMS               BIT(1)
> > > @@ -97,6 +104,7 @@ struct io_pgtable_cfg {
> > >       #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_OUTER_WBWA         BIT(6)
> > >       #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_HD                 BIT(7)
> > >       #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_S2FWB              BIT(8)
> > > +     #define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_WARN_ON             BIT(9)
> >
> > This feels a bit fragile to me:
> >   * IOMMU-API users of io-pgtable shouldn't be passing this quirk
> >     but might end up doing so to paper over driver bugs.
> >
> >   * Low-level users of io-pgtable who expose page-table operations to
> >     userspace need to pass the quirk, but might well not bother because
> >     well-behaved userspace doesn't trigger the warning.
> >
> > So overall, it's all a bit unsatisfactory. Is there a way we could have
> > the warnings only when invoked via the IOMMU API?
> 
> iommu drivers _not_ setting this flag seems like a good way to achieve that ;-)
> 
> The alternative is to move the warns to the iommu driver... but they
> could just as easily remove the WARN_ON()s as they could set the
> NO_WARN_ON quirk, so :shrug:?

Bah, I also don't have a good idea to improve this, so I guess I'll take
what you have for now.

Will


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-20 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-14 17:53 [PATCH v4 00/40] drm/msm: sparse / "VM_BIND" support Rob Clark
2025-05-14 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 05/40] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add quirk to quiet WARN_ON() Rob Clark
2025-05-15 14:33   ` Will Deacon
2025-05-15 14:48     ` Rob Clark
2025-05-20 11:31       ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-05-20 13:06         ` Robin Murphy
2025-05-20 14:06           ` Will Deacon
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-14 16:58 [PATCH v4 00/40] drm/msm: sparse / "VM_BIND" support Rob Clark
2025-05-14 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 05/40] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add quirk to quiet WARN_ON() Rob Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250520113146.GA18435@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=cwabbott0@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox