From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: debug: remove debug exception registration infrastructure
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 10:38:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250521093817.GA20245@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250512174326.133905-12-ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 06:43:26PM +0100, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote:
> Now that debug exceptions are handled individually and without the need
> for dynamic registration, remove the unused registration infrastructure.
>
> Remove `early_brk64` as it has been made redundant by
> (arm64: debug: split brk64 exception entry) and is not used anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h | 2 -
> arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h | 2 -
> arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 4 --
> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 3 -
> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 26 +--------
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 75 -------------------------
> 6 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 111 deletions(-)
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> index 53f0b2281f14..a5f344e556df 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> @@ -346,9 +346,6 @@ int aarch32_break_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> }
> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(aarch32_break_handler);
>
> -void __init debug_traps_init(void)
> -{}
> -
> /* Re-enable single step for syscall restarting. */
> void user_rewind_single_step(struct task_struct *task)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index 50d7a6a75f45..ce20f46e08cb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -1101,29 +1101,5 @@ int ubsan_brk_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
> }
> #endif
>
> -/*
> - * Initial handler for AArch64 BRK exceptions
> - * This handler only used until debug_traps_init().
> - */
> -int __init early_brk64(unsigned long addr, unsigned long esr,
> - struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
> - if (esr_is_cfi_brk(esr))
> - return cfi_brk_handler(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
> -#endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS
> - if ((esr_brk_comment(esr) & ~KASAN_BRK_MASK) == KASAN_BRK_IMM)
> - return kasan_brk_handler(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
> -#endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP
> - if ((esr_brk_comment(esr) & ~UBSAN_BRK_MASK) == UBSAN_BRK_IMM)
> - return ubsan_brk_handler(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
> -#endif
> - return bug_brk_handler(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
The early bug handler is now only called if the brk immediate matches,
but I couldn't spot any problems with that.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-12 17:43 [PATCH v2 00/11] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] arm64: debug: clean up single_step_handler logic Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:35 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] arm64: debug: call software break handlers statically Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:35 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-02 16:39 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] arm64: debug: call step " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:35 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 16:02 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] arm64: debug: remove break/step handler registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:36 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] arm64: entry: Add entry and exit functions for debug exceptions Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:36 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 14:08 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-29 10:11 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] arm64: debug: split hardware breakpoint exeception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:36 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 15:17 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-28 16:10 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] arm64: debug: split single stepping exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 16:29 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 15:22 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-29 10:10 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-29 10:48 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] arm64: debug: split hardware watchpoint " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 16:59 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 13:47 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-28 15:42 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-29 10:13 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] arm64: debug: split brk64 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] arm64: debug: split bkpt32 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-21 9:07 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-29 10:43 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: debug: remove debug exception registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-21 9:38 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-05-28 16:41 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-29 10:15 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-13 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2025-05-13 15:19 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-16 11:57 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2025-05-28 10:38 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-03 16:10 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250521093817.GA20245@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox