Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] arm64: entry: Add entry and exit functions for debug exceptions
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 11:11:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250529101129.GB29082@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ddc2fd08-1171-4ec7-9ffd-eae069984d48@arm.com>

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 03:08:35PM +0100, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote:
> On 20/05/2025 16:36, Will Deacon wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 06:43:20PM +0100, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote:
> > > Duplicate the `debug_exception_entry()` and `debug_exception_exit()`
> > nit: it's debug_exception_enter().
> Thanks,fixed for v3.
> > > functions from mm/fault.c, as they are needed to split
> > > the debug exceptions entry paths from the current unified one.
> > > The original will be removed in a cleanup patch.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > >   arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> > > index b260ddc4d3e9..92d78b329e67 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> > > @@ -418,6 +418,28 @@ static inline void fp_user_discard(void)
> > >   	}
> > >   }
> > > +/*
> > > + * In debug exception context, we explicitly disable preemption despite
> > > + * having interrupts disabled.
> > > + * This serves two purposes: it makes it much less likely that we would
> > > + * accidentally schedule in exception context and it will force a warning
> > > + * if we somehow manage to schedule by accident.
> > > + */
> > > +static void debug_exception_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > +{
> > > +	preempt_disable();
> > > +
> > > +	/* This code is a bit fragile.  Test it. */
> > > +	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(), "exception_enter didn't work");
> > > +}
> > > +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(debug_exception_enter);
> > > +
> > > +static void debug_exception_exit(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > +{
> > > +	preempt_enable_no_resched();
> > > +}
> > > +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(debug_exception_exit);
> > Could you make these externally visible (i.e. drop the 'static') so that
> > you can remove the definitions from mm/fault.c at the same time? Then
> > you could add the 'static' back at the end when there are no more
> > external callers.
> > 
> If you are happy with some header noise, adding `debug_exception_enter()`
> and `debug_exception_exit()` to include/asm/exception.h` so that they can
> be visible in `mm/fault.c` during the clean up and removing them when
> done, I would much prefer doing it that way !
> 
> It felt strange to just have some duplicate code, but I didn't know
> what would be acceptable.
> I will make the change for v3, unless the header noise mentioned above is
> an issue.

Thanks, that sounds great.

Will


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-29 10:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-12 17:43 [PATCH v2 00/11] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] arm64: debug: clean up single_step_handler logic Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:35   ` Will Deacon
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] arm64: debug: call software break handlers statically Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:35   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-02 16:39     ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] arm64: debug: call step " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:35   ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 16:02     ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] arm64: debug: remove break/step handler registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:36   ` Will Deacon
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] arm64: entry: Add entry and exit functions for debug exceptions Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:36   ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 14:08     ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-29 10:11       ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] arm64: debug: split hardware breakpoint exeception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 15:36   ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 15:17     ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-28 16:10       ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] arm64: debug: split single stepping exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 16:29   ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 15:22     ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-29 10:10       ` Will Deacon
2025-05-29 10:48         ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] arm64: debug: split hardware watchpoint " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-20 16:59   ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 13:47     ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-28 15:42       ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-29 10:13         ` Will Deacon
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] arm64: debug: split brk64 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] arm64: debug: split bkpt32 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-21  9:07   ` Will Deacon
2025-05-29 10:43     ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: debug: remove debug exception registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-21  9:38   ` Will Deacon
2025-05-28 16:41     ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-29 10:15       ` Will Deacon
2025-05-13 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2025-05-13 15:19   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-05-16 11:57     ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2025-05-28 10:38       ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-03 16:10         ` Ada Couprie Diaz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250529101129.GB29082@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox