From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Wilfred Mallawa" <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
"Laszlo Fiat" <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 16:14:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250611211456.GA869983@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250611105140.1639031-7-cassel@kernel.org>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:51:42PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Commit ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can
> detect Link Up") changed so that we no longer call dw_pcie_wait_for_link(),
> and instead enumerate the bus directly after receiving the Link Up IRQ.
>
> This means that there is no longer any delay between link up and the bus
> getting enumerated.
Minor quibble about "no longer any delay": dw_pcie_wait_for_link()
doesn't contain any explicit delay *after* we notice the link is up,
so we didn't guarantee sufficient delay even before ec9fd499b9c6.
If the link came up before the first check, dw_pcie_wait_for_link()
didn't delay at all. Otherwise, it delayed 90ms * N, and we have no
idea when in the 90ms period the link came up, so the post link-up
delay was effectively some random amount between 0 and 90ms.
I would propose something like:
PCI: dw-rockchip: Wait PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS after link-up IRQ
Per PCIe r6.0, sec 6.6.1, software must generally wait a minimum of
100ms (PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS) after Link training completes before
sending a Configuration Request.
Prior to ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since
we can detect Link Up"), dw-rockchip used dw_pcie_wait_for_link(),
which waited between 0 and 90ms after the link came up before we
enumerate the bus, and this was apparently enough for most devices.
After ec9fd499b9c6, rockchip_pcie_rc_sys_irq_thread() started
enumeration immediately when handling the link-up IRQ, and devices
(e.g., Laszlo Fiat's PLEXTOR PX-256M8PeGN NVMe SSD) may not be ready
to handle config requests yet.
Delay PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS after the link-up IRQ before starting
enumeration.
> As per PCIe r6.0, sec 6.6.1, a Downstream Port that supports Link speeds
> greater than 5.0 GT/s, software must wait a minimum of 100 ms after Link
> training completes before sending a Configuration Request.
>
> Add this delay in the threaded link up IRQ handler in order to satisfy
> the requirements of the PCIe spec.
>
> Laszlo Fiat reported (off-list) that his PLEXTOR PX-256M8PeGN NVMe SSD is
> no longer functional, and simply reverting commit ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI:
> dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can detect Link Up") makes his
> SSD functional again. Adding the 100 ms delay as required by the spec also
> makes the SSD functional again.
>
> Cc: Laszlo Fiat <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>
> Fixes: ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can detect Link Up")
I would argue that 0e898eb8df4e ("PCI: rockchip-dwc: Add Rockchip
RK356X host controller driver") is the right Fixes: commit here
because dw_pcie_wait_for_link() *never* waited the required time, and
it's quite possible that other devices don't work correctly. The
delay was about 90ms - <time required for link training>, so could be
significantly less than 100ms.
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> index 93171a392879..a941a239cbfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> @@ -459,6 +459,13 @@ static irqreturn_t rockchip_pcie_rc_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
> if (reg & PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED) {
> if (rockchip_pcie_link_up(pci)) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "Received Link up event. Starting enumeration!\n");
> + /*
> + * As per PCIe r6.0, sec 6.6.1, a Downstream Port that
> + * supports Link speeds greater than 5.0 GT/s, software
> + * must wait a minimum of 100 ms after Link training
> + * completes before sending a Configuration Request.
> + */
I think the comment at the PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS definition should be
enough (although it might need to be updated to mention link-up).
This delay is going to be a standard piece of every driver, so it
won't require special notice.
> + msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS);
> /* Rescan the bus to enumerate endpoint devices */
> pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> pci_rescan_bus(pp->bridge->bus);
> --
> 2.49.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 10:51 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: dwc: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: " Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 12:33 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-11 21:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-06-12 11:19 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-12 11:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 11:40 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-12 12:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 13:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 14:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 15:03 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 15:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 16:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-05 9:26 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: dwc: Link Up IRQ fixes Niklas Cassel
2025-05-05 9:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready Niklas Cassel
2025-05-05 14:09 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250611211456.GA869983@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=laszlo.fiat@proton.me \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox