[PATCH] arm64: defconfig: fix renamed Qualcomm EUSB2 PHY symbol

[PATCH] arm64: defconfig: fix renamed Qualcomm EUSB2 PHY symbol

[Johan Hovold]

The Qualcomm Synopsis EUSB2 PHY driver was recently renamed along with
its Kconfig symbol but the defconfig was never updated (which breaks USB
on a number of Qualcomm platforms).

Fixes: 8d3b5f637546 ("phy: move phy-qcom-snps-eusb2 out of its vendor sub-directory")
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Ivaylo Ivanov <ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 8c54aaea7866..6b5958fb46bc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -1573,6 +1573,7 @@ CONFIG_RESET_QCOM_AOSS=y
 CONFIG_RESET_QCOM_PDC=m
 CONFIG_RESET_RZG2L_USBPHY_CTRL=y
 CONFIG_RESET_TI_SCI=y
+CONFIG_PHY_SNPS_EUSB2=m
 CONFIG_PHY_XGENE=y
 CONFIG_PHY_CAN_TRANSCEIVER=m
 CONFIG_PHY_NXP_PTN3222=m
@@ -1597,7 +1598,6 @@ CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_EDP=m
 CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_PCIE2=m
 CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_QMP=m
 CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_QUSB2=m
-CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_SNPS_EUSB2=m
 CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_EUSB2_REPEATER=m
 CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_M31_USB=m
 CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_USB_HS=m
-- 
2.49.0

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: fix renamed Qualcomm EUSB2 PHY symbol

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16/06/2025 12:32, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The Qualcomm Synopsis EUSB2 PHY driver was recently renamed along with
> its Kconfig symbol but the defconfig was never updated (which breaks USB
> on a number of Qualcomm platforms).
> 
> Fixes: 8d3b5f637546 ("phy: move phy-qcom-snps-eusb2 out of its vendor sub-directory")
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> Cc: Ivaylo Ivanov <ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>

Thanks. This was sent on the lists some time ago and since a week is
already in pending-fixes. Should be in coming RC as well.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: fix renamed Qualcomm EUSB2 PHY symbol

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16/06/2025 13:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/06/2025 12:32, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> The Qualcomm Synopsis EUSB2 PHY driver was recently renamed along with
>> its Kconfig symbol but the defconfig was never updated (which breaks USB
>> on a number of Qualcomm platforms).
>>
>> Fixes: 8d3b5f637546 ("phy: move phy-qcom-snps-eusb2 out of its vendor sub-directory")
>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Ivaylo Ivanov <ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks. This was sent on the lists some time ago and since a week is
> already in pending-fixes. Should be in coming RC as well.

Uh, now I noticed that due some other work I put it on different fixes
branch and that fixes branch was not feeding pending-fixes. That's my
bad, I need to fix my workflow.

It was in linux-next, though.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: fix renamed Qualcomm EUSB2 PHY symbol

[Johan Hovold]

On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 01:23:08PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/06/2025 13:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 16/06/2025 12:32, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >> The Qualcomm Synopsis EUSB2 PHY driver was recently renamed along with
> >> its Kconfig symbol but the defconfig was never updated (which breaks USB
> >> on a number of Qualcomm platforms).
> >>
> >> Fixes: 8d3b5f637546 ("phy: move phy-qcom-snps-eusb2 out of its vendor sub-directory")
> >> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> >> Cc: Ivaylo Ivanov <ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Thanks. This was sent on the lists some time ago and since a week is
> > already in pending-fixes. Should be in coming RC as well.
> 
> Uh, now I noticed that due some other work I put it on different fixes
> branch and that fixes branch was not feeding pending-fixes. That's my
> bad, I need to fix my workflow.
> 
> It was in linux-next, though.

Ah, good. I did search the list but apparently only lkml so I missed
that one.

Johan